The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does It Matter if I Hate Teamwork? What Impacts Student Attitudes toward Teamwork
Abstract
The ability to work in teams is a skill that is often taught in universities to be applied in the business world. This study of junior and senior college students shows that project grades, perceived workload, time in class for project work, use of peer evaluations, and absence of a “free-rider” problem were significant predictors of attitudes toward teamwork. On the basis of their results, the authors suggest assigning a reasonable workload, allowing class time to work on projects, and using peer evaluations as strategies for improving student teamwork experiences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cooperative Learning Returns To College What Evidence Is There That It Works?
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998) · Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091389809602629 · Cited by 1,011
Cited by
Seidel, S. B., Reggi, A. L., Schinske, J. N., Burrus, L. W., & Tanner, K. D. (2015) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.15-03-0049 · Cited by 134
Virtual simulation: New method for assessing teamwork skills
Kotlyar, I., & Krasman, J. (2022) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12368 · Cited by 17
Who Does What? Work Division and Allocation Strategies of Computer Science Student Teams
van der Meulen, A., & Aivaloglou, E. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET) · doi:10.1109/icse-seet52601.2021.00037
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfaff, E., & Huddleston, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-45
- ISSN
- 0273-4753 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6550
- OpenAlex
- W2149946956
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
