Cited by 191Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization

Object Detection and Tracking for Autonomous Navigation in Dynamic Environments

Ess, Andreas, Schindler, Konrad, Leibe, Bastian, Van Gool, Luc·2010·The International Journal of Robotics Research

Abstract

We address the problem of vision-based navigation in busy inner-city locations, using a stereo rig mounted on a mobile platform. In this scenario semantic information becomes important: rather than modeling moving objects as arbitrary obstacles, they should be categorized and tracked in order to predict their future behavior. To this end, we combine classical geometric world mapping with object category detection and tracking. Object-category-specific detectors serve to find instances of the most important object classes (in our case pedestrians and cars). Based on these detections, multi-object tracking recovers the objects’ trajectories, thereby making it possible to predict their future locations, and to employ dynamic path planning. The approach is evaluated on challenging, realistic video sequences recorded at busy inner-city locations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0278364910365417

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that case, non-parametric methods such as particle filters are used, and physical parameters such as the size of the object are tracked alongside dynamics.

    “In that case, non-parametric methods such as particle filters are used, and physical parameters such as the size of the object are tracked alongside dynamics [191].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ess, A., Schindler, K., Leibe, B., & Van Gool, L.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Computer Vision Laboratory, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland and ESAT/PSI-VISICS IBBT, K.U. Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
Corresponding author
Schindler, Konrad
Venue
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Published
2010-05-12
Volume
29
Issue
14
Pages
1707-1725
ISSN
  • 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3176
OpenAlex
W2041600899
Cited by
191
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
34.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Robotics Research (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Keywords
object detection, multi-target tracking, autonomous navigation, dynamic environments, semantic navigation, pedestrian detection, car detection, stereo vision, dynamic path planning, trajectory prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review