The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physical feasibility of robot base inertial parameter identification: A linear matrix inequality approach
Abstract
Identification of robot dynamics is a key issue in boosting the performance of model-based control techniques, having also a key role in realistic simulation. Robot dynamic parameters have physical meaning, hence parameter estimations must correspond to physically feasible values. Since it is only possible to identify linear combinations of parameters (the base parameters) the physical feasibility of such combinations cannot be directly asserted. In this paper we show that feasibility conditions define a convex set and can be written as a linear matrix inequality (LMI), suitable for semidefinite programming (SDP) techniques. We propose three methods based on LMI–SDP to deal with the feasibility of base parameters. The first method checks if a given base parameter estimation has physical meaning. The second method corrects infeasible estimations, finding the closest feasible base parameters. These two methods can be applied to existing regression techniques. The third method performs parameter identification through ordinary least squares regression constrained to the feasible space, guaranteeing the optimal solution. Experiments with a seven-link robot manipulator are provided, and efficiency and scalability are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gaz, C., Cognetti, M., Oliva, A., Robuffo Giordano, P., & De Luca, A. (2019) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2931248 · Cited by 323
Robot Model Identification and Learning: A Modern Perspective
Lee, T., Kwon, J., Wensing, P. M., & Park, F. C. (2024) · Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-061523-102310 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Sousa, C. D., & Cortesão, R.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-02-20
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 931-944
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W2130440600
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical feasibility of robot base inertial parameter identification: A linear matrix inequality approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0278364913514870
- The paper
- Sousa, C. D., & Cortesão, R. (2014). Physical feasibility of robot base inertial parameter identification: A linear matrix inequality approach. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364913514870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.