The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sampling-based robotic information gathering algorithms
Abstract
We propose three sampling-based motion planning algorithms for generating informative mobile robot trajectories. The goal is to find a trajectory that maximizes an information quality metric (e.g. variance reduction, information gain, or mutual information) and also falls within a pre-specified budget constraint (e.g. fuel, energy, or time). Prior algorithms have employed combinatorial optimization techniques to solve these problems, but existing techniques are typically restricted to discrete domains and often scale poorly in the size of the problem. Our proposed rapidly exploring information gathering (RIG) algorithms combine ideas from sampling-based motion planning with branch and bound techniques to achieve efficient information gathering in continuous space with motion constraints. We provide analysis of the asymptotic optimality of our algorithms, and we present several conservative pruning strategies for modular, submodular, and time-varying information objectives. We demonstrate that our proposed techniques find optimal solutions more quickly than existing combinatorial solvers, and we provide a proof-of-concept field implementation on an autonomous surface vehicle performing a wireless signal strength monitoring task in a lake.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Latombe, J.-C. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4022-9 · Cited by 6,396
Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces
Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., & Overmars, M. H. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/70.508439 · Cited by 6,343 · cited 7×
“The use of sampling-based motion planning algorithms, such as the rapidly-exploring random tree (RRT) (LaValle and Kuffner, 2001) and the probabilistic roadmap (PRM) (Kavraki et al., 1996), has increased enormously in past years.”
MethodInfluentialSampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning
Karaman, S., & Frazzoli, E. (2011) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364911406761 · Cited by 5,275
LaValle, S. M. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546877 · Cited by 5,211
LaValle, S. M. (2006) · Cited by 4,177
Randomized Kinodynamic Planning
LaValle, S. M., & Kuffner, J. J. (2001) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783640122067453 · Cited by 3,254
Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses
Wald, A. (1945) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731118 · Cited by 1,671
The Open Motion Planning Library
Sucan, I. A., Moll, M., & Kavraki, L. E. (2012) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2012.2205651 · Cited by 1,616
Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses
Wald, A. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_18 · Cited by 1,345
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollinger, G. A., & Sukhatme, G. S.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-06-27
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1271-1287
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W2143088799
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 20.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sampling-based robotic information gathering algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0278364914533443
- The paper
- Hollinger, G. A., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2014). Sampling-based robotic information gathering algorithms. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364914533443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.