The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Capital: A Missing Link to Disaster Recovery
Abstract
Post-disaster recovery processes should be considered as opportunities for development, by revitalizing the local economy and upgrading livelihoods and living conditions. Social capital, which is defined as a function of trust, social norms, participation, and network, can play an important role in recovery. This paper examines the role of social capital in the post earthquake rehabilitation and reconstruction programs in two cases: Kobe, Japan and Gujarat, India. The Kobe case study shows that the community with social capital and with a tradition of community activities can pro-actively participate in the reconstruction program, and thereby can make a successful and speedy recovery. A model for bonding, bridging and linking social capital was developed from the Kobe experience, and was applied to Gujarat in four different communities. It was observed that the community with social capital records the highest satisfaction rate for the new town planning and has the speediest recovery rate. The role of community leaders has been prominent in utilizing social capital in the recovery process, and facilitating collective decision-making. Thus, although the two case studies differ in socio-economic and cultural contexts, the communities’ social capital and leadership are found to be the most effective elements in both cases in enhancing collective actions and disaster recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques
Cooke, N. J. (1994) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1994.1083 · Cited by 579
Cited by
Social Capital and Community Resilience
Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764214550299 · Cited by 2,331
Determinants of Risk: Exposure and Vulnerability
Cardona, O.-D., van Aalst, M. K., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., McGregor, G., Perez, R., Pulwarty, R. S., Schipper, E. L. F., Sinh, B. T., Décamps, H., et al. (2012) · Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139177245.005 · Cited by 1,007
Trauma is a public health issue
Magruder, K. M., McLaughlin, K. A., & Elmore Borbon, D. L. (2017) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2017.1375338 · Cited by 322
Sadri, A. M., Ukkusuri, S. V., Lee, S., Clawson, R., Aldrich, D., Nelson, M. S., Seipel, J., & Kelly, D. (2018) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-017-3103-0 · Cited by 265
Disaster risk reduction: Psychological perspectives on preparedness
Paton, D. (2019) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajpy.12237 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakagawa, Y., & Shaw, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-34
- ISSN
- 0280-7270 (ISSN-L)
- 2753-5703
- OpenAlex
- W2123697484
- Cited by
- 945
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Capital: A Missing Link to Disaster Recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/028072700402200101
- The paper
- Nakagawa, Y., & Shaw, R. (2004). Social Capital: A Missing Link to Disaster Recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072700402200101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.