Cited by 44Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsPain Management and Placebo EffectMultisensory perception and integration

Are You Suggesting That’s My Hand? The Relation Between Hypnotic Suggestibility and the Rubber Hand Illusion

Open access
Walsh, E., Guilmette, D. N., Longo, M. R., Moore, J. W., Oakley, D. A., Halligan, P. W., Mehta, M. A., Deeley, Q.·2015·Perception

Abstract

Hypnotic suggestibility (HS) is the ability to respond automatically to suggestions and to experience alterations in perception and behavior. Hypnotically suggestible participants are also better able to focus and sustain their attention on an experimental stimulus. The present study explores the relation between HS and susceptibility to the rubber hand illusion (RHI). Based on previous research with visual illusions, it was predicted that higher HS would lead to a stronger RHI. Two behavioral output measures of the RHI, an implicit (proprioceptive drift) and an explicit (RHI questionnaire) measure, were correlated against HS scores. Hypnotic suggestibility correlated positively with the implicit RHI measure contributing to 30% of the variation. However, there was no relation between HS and the explicit RHI questionnaire measure, or with compliance control items. High hypnotic suggestibility may facilitate, via attentional mechanisms, the multisensory integration of visuoproprioceptive inputs that leads to greater perceptual mislocalization of a participant's hand. These results may provide insight into the multisensory brain mechanisms involved in our sense of embodiment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0301006615594266

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bayesian combination of the paper's data and Walsh et al.'s prior result provides evidence that proprioceptive drift is related to hypnotisability even when measured as a difference score.

    “Bayesian combination of our data and this prior result provides evidence that even when measured in this way, proprioceptive drift is related to hypnotisability (r = 0.22 (SE = 0.08). 95% CI [0.05, 0.38] BH(0,0.3) = 13.86).”
  • The a priori estimates for the Bayes factors appear plausible according to the correlation between proprioceptive drift and hypnotisability reported in Walsh et al. and the correlation between subjective report and sensory suggestibility reported in Marotta et al.

    “These a priori estimates appear plausible according to the correlation between proprioceptive drift and hypnotisability reported in Walsh et al.46 and the correlation between subjective report and sensory suggestibility reported in Marotta et al.47.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 44

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Bowers K, 1966 "Hypnotic behavior: The differentiation of trance and demand characteristic variables" Journal of abnormal psychology 71 42
  2. Bowers K S, 1993 "The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Normative and comparative data" International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 41 35-46
  3. Elkins G R, Barabasz A F, Council J R, Spiegel D, 2014 "Advancing Research and Practice: The Revised APA Division 30 Definition of Hypnosis" International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 63 1-9
  4. Fehr F S, Stern J A, 1970 "Peripheral physiological variables and emotion: the James-Lange theory revisited" Psychological Bulletin 74 411
  5. Hagura N, Takei T, Hirose S, Aramaki Y, Matsumura M, Sadato N, Naito E, 2007 "Activity in the posterior parietal cortex mediates visual dominance over kinesthesia" The Journal of Neuroscience 27 7047-7053
  6. Hua L H, Strigo I A, Baxter L C, Johnson S C, 2005 "Anteroposterior somatotopy of innocuous cooling activation focus in human dorsal posterior insular cortex" American Journal of Physiology- Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 289 R319-R325
  7. Kirsch I, Council J R, Wickless C, 1990 "Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A" International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 38 112- 124
  8. Miller R J, 1975 "Response to the Ponzo illusion as a reflection of hypnotic susceptibility" International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 23 148-157
  9. Mitchell M B, 1970 "Hypnotizability and distractibility" American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 13 35- 45
  10. Moseley G L, Olthof N, Venema A, Don S, Wijers M, Gallace A, Spence C, 2008 "Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 13169-13173
  11. Nuys D V, 1973 "Meditation, attention, and hypnotic susceptibility: A correlational study" International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 21 59-69
  12. Ramakonar H, Franz E A, Lind C R, 2011 "The rubber hand illusion and its application to clinical neuroscience" Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 18 1596-1601
  13. Reber P J, 2013 "The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: a review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research" Neuropsychologia 51 2026-2042
  14. Schütz-Bosbach S, Avenanti A, Aglioti S M, Haggard P, 2009a "Don't do it! Cortical inhibition and self- attribution during action observation" Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21 1215-1227
  15. Shor R E, Orne E C, Press C P, 1962 Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Form A (Consulting Psychologists Press)
  16. Spanos N P, Burgess C A, Cross P A, MacLeod G, 1992 "Hypnosis, reporting bias, and suggested negative hallucinations" Journal of abnormal psychology 101 192
  17. Steiger J H, 1980 "Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix" Psychological Bulletin 87 245
  18. Tellegen A, Atkinson G, 1974 "Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (" absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility" Journal of abnormal psychology 83 268
  19. Tsakiris M, Haggard P, 2005 "The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self- attribution" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 80
  20. Tsakiris M, Tajadura-Jiménez A, Costantini M, 2011 "Just a heartbeat away from one's body: interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations" Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences rspb20102547
  21. Wagstaff G F, 1981 Hypnosis, compliance and belief (St. Martin's Press New York)
  22. Wallace B, 1988 "Hypnotic susceptibility, visual distraction, and reports of Necker Cube apparent reversals" The Journal of general psychology 115 389-396
  23. Wallace B, Hoyenga K B, 1980 "Production of proprioceptive errors with induced hypnotic anesthesia" International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 28 140-147
  24. Wallace B, Knight T A, Garrett J B, 1976 "Hypnotic susceptibility and frequency reports to illusory stimuli" Journal of abnormal psychology 85 558
  25. Zeller D, Gross C, Bartsch A, Johansen-Berg H, Classen J, 2011 "Ventral premotor cortex may be required for dynamic changes in the feeling of limb ownership: a lesion study" The Journal of Neuroscience 31 4852-4857

Authors
Walsh, E., Guilmette, D. N., Longo, M. R., Moore, J. W., Oakley, D. A., Halligan, P. W., Mehta, M. A., & Deeley, Q.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Stonehill College (US)
  • University of London (GB)
  • Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Walsh, E.
Venue
Perception
Published
2015-06
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
709-723
ISSN
  • 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4233
OpenAlex
W1876197337
Cited by
44
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
hypnotic susceptibility, rubber hand illusion, multisensory integration, embodiment, proprioceptive drift, attention, compliance control, selfhood
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Image, Humans, Illusions, Individuality, Proprioception, Suggestion, Visual Perception, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review