Professional versus self-applied makeup: do makeup artists add value?
Abstract
While a number of studies have investigated the effects of makeup on how people are perceived, the vast majority have used professionally applied makeup. Here, we tested the hypothesis that professional makeup is more effective than self-applied makeup. We photographed the same target women under controlled conditions wearing no makeup, makeup they applied themselves, and makeup applied by professional makeup artists. Participants rated the faces as appearing more attractive, more feminine, and as having higher status when wearing professional makeup than self-applied makeup. Secondarily, we found that participants perceived the professional makeup as appearing heavier and less natural looking than the self-applied makeup. This work shows that professional makeup is more effective than self-applied makeup and begins to elucidate the nature of makeup artistry. We discuss these findings with respect to personal decoration and physical attractiveness, as well as the notion of artists as experts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of cosmetics has been shown to increase perceptions of attractiveness.
“Cosmetics are a popular tool to alter appearance and their use has been shown to increase perceptions of attractiveness [29–36].”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Applying make-up requires technical skill, and perceptions of attractiveness differ depending upon the skill of the person applying the make-up.
“applying make-up requires technical skill, and perceptions of attractiveness differ depending upon the skill of the person applying the make-up [31].”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Faces with make-up applied are consistently rated as more attractive than those without make-up.
“faces with make-up applied to them were consistently rated as more attractive than those without make-up.”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive
Rhodes, G., Hickford, C., & Jeffery, L. (2000) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712600161718 · Cited by 226 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Because there is a positive relationship between femininity and attractiveness (Law Smith et al., 2006; Rhodes et al., 2000), this likely plays a role in the effect of makeup on attractiveness.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters
Gulati, A., Martínez-Garcia, M., Fernández, D., Lozano, M. A., Lepri, B., & Oliver, N. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240882 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Batres, C., Porcheron, A., Courrèges, S., & Russell, R.
- Affiliations
- Franklin & Marshall College (US)
- Gettysburg College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Russell, Richard
- Venue
- Perception
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-07-02
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 709-719
- ISSN
- 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4233
- OpenAlex
- W3173213326
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perception (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College (Gettysburg College) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Keywords
- makeup, facial attractiveness, perceived femininity, perceived social status, makeup artistry, face perception
- MeSH terms
- Cosmetics, Face, Female, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review