The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations
Abstract
The languages of rights and liberalism are probably the most frequently used in contemporary international politics. The language of rights, in particular, has become predominant. . . . The contractarian vocabulary - of agreement, reciprocity, contractual obligation, and especially fairness - is widely used in popular debate on international issues, particularly when the issues are economic ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geographies of care and responsibility
Lawson, V. (2007) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00520.x · Cited by 876
Rethinking Care Ethics: On the Promise and Potential of an Intersectional Analysis
HANKIVSKY, O. (2014) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000094 · Cited by 287
Care: Intersections of scales, inequalities and crises
Williams, F. (2018) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392118765206 · Cited by 124
Care Ethics and Natural Law Theory: Toward an Institutional Political Theory of Caring
Engster, D. (2004) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00144.x · Cited by 89
Human Rights, Care Ethics and Situated Universal Norms
Carmalt, J. C. (2011) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00742.x · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, F.
- Venue
- Alternatives: Global, Local, Political
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-133
- ISSN
- 0304-3754 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-3150
- OpenAlex
- W646177859
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/030437549702200105
- The paper
- Robinson, F. (1997). Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549702200105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
