Cited by 431Diverse Music Education InsightsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessSport Psychology and Performance

Self-efficacy and music performance

Open access
McPherson, Gary E., McCormick, John·2006·Psychology of Music

Abstract

This study is the second in a series of investigations attempting to clarify relationships between variables that impact on a young musician's ability to perform music (as assessed on a graded music examination). Consistent with studies on school academic subjects, our previous investigation demonstrated the importance of self-efficacy in predicting young musicians’ performance examination results. In the current study, structural equation modelling allowed us to compare two different types of graded music performance examinations. Although differences emerged between the two sets of data, self-efficacy was again found to be the most important predictor of achievement in the examinations. Implications arising from this finding are discussed in the final section of the article.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0305735606064841

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Past studies have indicated a significant role of students' self-efficacy beliefs in music performance.

    “Past studies have indicated the significant role of students' self-efficacy beliefs in music performance (e.g.McCormick & McPherson, 2003;McPherson & McCormick, 2006;Schmidt, 2005).”

    From Teachers’ perceptions of declining participation in school music (2011) · cites this paper as McPherson & McCormick, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McPherson, G. E., & McCormick, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Psychology of Music
Published
2006-07
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
322-336
ISSN
  • 0305-7356 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3087
OpenAlex
W2029119812
Cited by
431
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
160.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Music (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
self-efficacy, music performance, young musicians, music achievement, performance anxiety, music education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review