Boys' and Girls' Preferences for Musical Instruments: A Function of Gender?
Abstract
This study investigated children's preferences for learning to play musical instruments and the extent to which boys' and girls' preferences are based on the gender stereotyped associations that have been found in previous studies. During individual interviews, 153 children (aged 9-1 1) from the north west of England stated their preferences for learning to play six musical instruments, and gave their views on which instruments should not be played by members of each sex. It was found that girls showed a significantly stronger preference for the piano, flute and violin than boys, whereas boys expressed a stronger preference for the guitar, drums and trumpet than girls. Log-linear analyses revealed that boys and girls have similar ideas about which instruments should not be played by members of each sex. Implications for music education are discussed, along with an explanation of the results in terms of children's social understanding of gender differentiation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children would experience more bullying if they played an instrument that was considered inappropriate for their gender.
“For example, O'Neill and Boulton (1996) found that children would experience more bullying if they played an instrument that was considered inappropriate for their gender.”
From Teachers’ perceptions of declining participation in school music (2011) · cites this paper as O'Neill and Boulton (1996)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teachers’ perceptions of declining participation in school music
Ng, C.-H. C., & Hartwig, K. (2011) · Research Studies in Music Education · doi:10.1177/1321103x11423598 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- O'Neill, S. A., & Boultona, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Keele University (GB)
- Venue
- Psychology of Music
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-183
- ISSN
- 0305-7356 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3087
- OpenAlex
- W2095872899
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 29.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Music (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Keywords
- gender stereotypes, piano, flute, violin, guitar, drums, trumpet, music education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
