Cited by 149Diverse Music Education InsightsSport Psychology and PerformanceEducational Outcomes and Influences

The Predictors of Achievement and Dropout in Instrumental Tuition

Hallam, Susan·1998·Psychology of Music

Abstract

This study, using Carroll's (1963) model of learning as a framework, considers the relative importance of time spent practising in determining learning outcomes in instrumental tuition. Carroll's model states that degree of learning is a function of time spent learning, divided by time required for learning. One hundred and nine violin and viola pupils aged 6-16 years took part in the study. Multiple regression revealed that length of time learning (beta weight .78) and ability to understand instructions (.23) were the best predictors of level of achievement (R = .88), while the quality of achievement was best predicted by the teachers' rating of musical ability (5). Dropping out was best predicted by a range of ability and attitudinal measures. The findings are discussed in relation to the ways in which the quantity and quality of attainment may be determined by different presage and process factors and the importance of developing explanatory multivariate models in the field of instrumental tuition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0305735698262002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding about personal interest and valuing is consistent with studies that highlight the importance of personal attitudes and intention in music learning.

    “This finding is consistent with studies that highlight the importance of personal attitudes and intention (Hallam, 1998) in music learning”

    From Teachers’ perceptions of declining participation in school music (2011) · cites this paper as Hallam, 1998

  • Students' prior knowledge and exposure to music are important cognitive factors as they will have implications for competence belief and motivation to continue learning music, especially instrumental music.

    “In addition, students' prior knowledge and exposure to music are important cognitive factors as they will have implications for competence belief and motivation to continue learning music, especially instrumental music (Hallam, 1998).”

    From Teachers’ perceptions of declining participation in school music (2011) · cites this paper as Hallam, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hallam, S.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hallam, Susan
Venue
Psychology of Music
Published
1998-10
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
116-132
ISSN
  • 0305-7356 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3087
OpenAlex
W2138323262
Cited by
149
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
31.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology of Music (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
music achievement, school dropout, violin, Viola, practice time, learning time, musical ability, student attitudes, music education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review