Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Globalisation and Inequality

Hurrell, Andrew, Woods, Ngaire·1995·Millennium: Journal of International Studies

Abstract

Neglected in liberal and other writings about globalisation is one particularly important feature of world politics: inequality. This chapter highlights the relationship between globalisation and inequality. It argues that inequality matters not just on grounds of equity, but is also important for understanding the nature of globalisation and its impact on world politics. Inequalities among states both shape the process of globalisation and are affected by it. The chapter describes globalisation, drawing on both an international society view of international relations and a view of the international political economy which emphasises the causes and promulgation of global inequalities. It examines four areas which illustrate the linkages between inequality and globalisation: state strength, international institutions, values and norms, and non-state actors. The liberal orthodoxy highlights the progressive enmeshment of economies and societies that results from globalisation. It emphasises the powerful international and transnational pressures that both constrain the range of viable state policies and influence the complexion of domestic politics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/03058298950240031001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hurrell, A., & Woods, N.
Venue
Millennium: Journal of International Studies
Published
1995-12
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
447-470
ISSN
  • 0305-8298 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9021
OpenAlex
W2076693123
Cited by
275
References
0
FWCI
21.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.