The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric
Schimmelfennig, F. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511492068 · Cited by 409
Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2007) · International Relations of the Asia-Pacific · doi:10.1093/irap/lcm012 · Cited by 355
International Socialization in the New Europe: Rational Action in an Institutional Environment
SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. (2000) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066100006001005 · Cited by 320
The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics
Acharya, A. (2007) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2008.0000 · Cited by 294
Vayrynen, R. (2003) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1111/1521-9488.501002 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Adler, E.
- Venue
- Millennium: Journal of International Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-277
- ISSN
- 0305-8298 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9021
- OpenAlex
- W1993719317
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/03058298970260021101
- The paper
- Adler, E. (1997). Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298970260021101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
