Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 152Discourse Analysis in Language StudiesAcademic Writing and PublishingHistory of Science and Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modern Evolution of the Experimental Report in Physics: Spectroscopic Articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980

Bazerman, Charles·1984·Social Studies of Science

Abstract

Recent studies of scientific texts need to be set against the history of the genre, which in part establishes the institutional framework within which any individual text is created. The definition of the appropriate form of communication is part of how a discipline constitutes itself, and is part of the achievement of that discipline. This paper examines the changing features of spectroscopic articles in Physical Review since its founding. Analyses of article length, use of references, sentence length and syntax, vocabulary, graphic features, organization and argument indicate that articles become increasingly theory-based and knowledge-embedded through time. Self-consciousness about the theoretical character of argument also increases. The changing character of communication within a scientific community also has implications for the social structure of that community.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/030631284014002001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

See all 152

Metadata

Authors
Bazerman, C.
Affiliations
Baruch College (US)
Corresponding author
Bazerman, Charles
Venue
Social Studies of Science
Published
1984-05
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
163-196
ISSN
  • 0036-8539 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-3127
  • 1460-3659
OpenAlex
W2061706012
Cited by
152
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
33.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Studies of Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
Keywords
laboratory reports, scientific writing, spectroscopy, Physical Review, history of science communication, disciplinary formation, citation practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.