Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Indigenous knowledge and western science: the possibility of dialogue

Bala, Arun, Gheverghese Joseph, George·2007·Race & Class

Abstract

In recent years, a number of scientific bodies and development agencies have called for indigenous and traditional systems of knowledge to be recognised as valuable reservoirs of learning - a move inspired, in part, by the prospect of multinational biotechnology corporations exploiting traditional non-western medical, agricultural and ecological knowledge. But recognising the legitimacy of indigenous knowledge, albeit partially, has profound implications for conceptions of science. First, the relationship between science and bodies of knowledge hitherto repudiated as myth and superstition needs to be rethought so that indigenous knowledge is demarcated from both science and pseudo-science. Second, the histories of science and mathematics need to recognise consistent criteria for establishing the existence of cross-cultural transmissions. Third, strategies need to be found to legitimise, where possible, indigenous theoretical and methodological discoveries. Fourth, a multicultural idea of science needs to be developed that is distinct from a postmodern, anti-science stance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0306396807080067

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Bala, A., & Gheverghese Joseph, G.
Affiliations
  • The Dialogue of Civilizations in the Birth of Modern Science
  • Universities of Exeter, Manchester and Toronto
Venue
Race & Class
Published
2007-07
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
39-61
ISSN
  • 0306-3968
  • 1741-3125
Cited by
34
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indigenous knowledge and western science: the possibility of dialogue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0306396807080067
The paper
Bala, A., & Gheverghese Joseph, G. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and western science: the possibility of dialogue. Race & Class. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396807080067