Internal and External Barriers to Help Seeking: Voices of Men Who Experienced Abuse in the Intimate Relationships
Abstract
This qualitative study explores internal and external barriers to help seeking among 41 men from four English-speaking countries who self-reported victimization from a female intimate partner. Twelve online focus groups were conducted and themes were identified inductively at a semantic level. Six identified themes represented four internal (blind to the abuse, maintaining relationships, male roles, and excuses) and two external barriers to help seeking (fear of seeking help and nowhere to go). Most participants who avoided seeking help did so due to their own lack of recognition of abuse and ability to assess their risk of harm, attempts to keep the family intact, masculine stereotypes, and excuses for their partner’s abuse. Some men who expressed an interest in seeking help were discouraged from it due to fear for their personal safety, a potential revictimization in the legal system, and the lack of support services available to men. This research suggests that the individuals who are abused in relationships, service providers, and the public at large could benefit from professional training about gender inclusive approaches to intimate partner abuse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since male victims have barriers, they utilize informal supports more than public supports.
“Since male victims have these barriers, they utilize informal supports (family members, friends, coworkers) more than public supports (government resources).”
From Help‐seeking behavior of male victims of intimate partner violence in Japan (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Male victims are sometimes reluctant to report their victimization to police, even in the most severe cases, due to prevailing norms regarding masculinity.
“Sometimes, male victims are reluctant to report their victimization to the police, even in the most severe cases due to the prevailing norms regarding masculinity (Lysova et al., 2022; Muller et al., 2009).”
From Male Victims’ Experiences With and Perceptions of the Criminal Justice Response to Intimate Partner Abuse (2022) · cites this paper as Lysova et al., 2022
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Lysova, A., Hanson, K., Dixon, L., Douglas, E. M., Hines, D. A., & Celi, E. M.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Practicing Psychologist, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Corresponding author
- Lysova, Alexandra
- Venue
- International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-05-28
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 538-559
- ISSN
- 0020-7497 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-624X
- 1552-6933
- OpenAlex
- W3028850662
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, help-seeking barriers, male victims, masculinity stereotypes, revictimization, relationship maintenance
- MeSH terms
- Intimate Partner Violence, Female, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Crime Victims, Bullying
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review