Cited by 70Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Internal and External Barriers to Help Seeking: Voices of Men Who Experienced Abuse in the Intimate Relationships

Lysova, Alexandra, Hanson, Kenzie, Dixon, Louise, Douglas, Emily M., Hines, Denise A., Celi, Elizabeth M.·2022·International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Abstract

This qualitative study explores internal and external barriers to help seeking among 41 men from four English-speaking countries who self-reported victimization from a female intimate partner. Twelve online focus groups were conducted and themes were identified inductively at a semantic level. Six identified themes represented four internal (blind to the abuse, maintaining relationships, male roles, and excuses) and two external barriers to help seeking (fear of seeking help and nowhere to go). Most participants who avoided seeking help did so due to their own lack of recognition of abuse and ability to assess their risk of harm, attempts to keep the family intact, masculine stereotypes, and excuses for their partner’s abuse. Some men who expressed an interest in seeking help were discouraged from it due to fear for their personal safety, a potential revictimization in the legal system, and the lack of support services available to men. This research suggests that the individuals who are abused in relationships, service providers, and the public at large could benefit from professional training about gender inclusive approaches to intimate partner abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0306624x20919710

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since male victims have barriers, they utilize informal supports more than public supports.

    “Since male victims have these barriers, they utilize informal supports (family members, friends, coworkers) more than public supports (government resources).”
  • Male victims are sometimes reluctant to report their victimization to police, even in the most severe cases, due to prevailing norms regarding masculinity.

    “Sometimes, male victims are reluctant to report their victimization to the police, even in the most severe cases due to the prevailing norms regarding masculinity (Lysova et al., 2022; Muller et al., 2009).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 70

Authors
Lysova, A., Hanson, K., Dixon, L., Douglas, E. M., Hines, D. A., & Celi, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Practicing Psychologist, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Corresponding author
Lysova, Alexandra
Venue
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
Published
2020-05-28
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
538-559
ISSN
  • 0020-7497 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-624X
  • 1552-6933
OpenAlex
W3028850662
Cited by
70
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
intimate partner violence, help-seeking barriers, male victims, masculinity stereotypes, revictimization, relationship maintenance
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Female, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Crime Victims, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review