CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 317Anthropological Studies and InsightsIndigenous Knowledge Systems and AgricultureEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local Knowledge in the Environment–Development Discourse: From dichotomies to situated knowledges

Nygren, Anja·1999·Critique of Anthropology
DOI 10.1177/0308275x9901900304
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article takes a critical look at the various approaches representing local knowledge as a scapegoat for underdevelopment or as a panacea for sustainability, these two representations characterizing the conventional environ-ment–development discourse. The static oppositions of local versus universal knowledge are challenged by establishing more diversified models to analyse the relationships of heterogeneous knowledges. The study emphasizes the complex articulation of knowledge repertoires by drawing on an ethnographic case study among migrant peasants in southeastern Nicaragua. Knowledge production is seen as a process of social negotiation involving multiple actors and complex power relations. The article underlines the issue of situated knowledges as one of the major challenges in developing anthropology as an approach that subjects fixed dichotomies between subject and object, fact and value, and the rational and the practical, to critical reconstruction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0308275x9901900304

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Haraway, Donna, 1996, Human Geography: An Essential Geography
  2. Posey, Darrell, 1983, The Dilemma of Amazon Development
  3. Rabella, Joaquim, 1995, Aproximación a la historia de Río San Juan
  4. Ross, Andrew, 1996, Science Wars
  5. Sokal, Alan D., 1996, Lingua Franca, 6, 62
  6. UNCED, 1993, Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development
  7. Van Beek, Walter, 1993, An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance
  8. Van der Ploeg, Jan, 1993, An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance
  9. Veracruz, Carlos, 1995, Inventario de programas y proyectos existentes
  10. Watson-Verran, Helen, 1995, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–315 of 315

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nygren, A.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Nygren, Anja
ORCID
Nygren, Anja
Venue
Critique of Anthropology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1999-09
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
267-288
ISSN
  • 0308-275X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3721
DOI
10.1177/0308275x9901900304
OpenAlex
W2082060221
Cited by
317
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Critique of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
Keywords
local knowledge, underdevelopment, sustainability, knowledge heterogeneity, knowledge production, power relations, situated knowledge, fact-value dichotomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review