CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Biblical Studies and InterpretationNarrative Theory and AnalysisFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The literary roles of Reuben and Judah in Genesis narratives: A ‘reflection complex’

Kraut, Judah·2018·Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
DOI 10.1177/0309089217711029
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Scholars have long perceived a relationship among Genesis narratives involving Reuben and Judah. Most treatments, historical in orientation, focus on the authorial and editorial processes that produced two episodes in which ‘competing’ Reuben and Judah narratives are preserved: the sale of Joseph (Gen. 37) and the guardianship of Benjamin (Gen. 42-3). Even literary studies of the Reuben and Judah characters typically address only some of the relevant narratives and reach limited conclusions about the characters’ import. This study, in contrast, contends that all of the Reuben and Judah narrative passages in Genesis—whatever the processes leading to their inclusion—comprise a latent complex with a literary purpose. Reuben and Judah compel Jacob to reconsider behaviors from his own life, reminding their father—respectively—of his failings and his nobler aspects. I dub this dynamic a ‘reflection complex’, consisting of multifarious intertextual links, including multiple instances of the ‘reflection stories’ described by Yair Zakovitch.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0309089217711029

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Andrew M. E., 1993, Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, 105
  2. Angel Hayyim, 2006, Jewish Bible Quarterly, 34
  3. Ben-Reuben Sarah, 1983, Beit Mikra, 28
  4. Berger David, 1996, Modern Scholarship in the Study of Torah
  5. Biddle Mark, 2002, Journal of Biblical Literature, 121
  6. Cross Frank Moore, 1998, From Epic to Canon, 53
  7. Grossfeld Bernard, 2006, Biblical Interpretation in Judaism Christianity, 44
  8. De Hoop Raymond, 2007, Old Testament Essays, 20
  9. Levin Yigal, 2004, Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, 116
  10. Loewenstamm Samuel, 1969, Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress of Jewish Studies, 69
  11. Noble Paul, 2002, Vetus Testamentum, 52
  12. Noth Martin, 1981, A History of Pentateuchal Tradition
  13. Penchansky David, ‘Staying the Night: Intertextuality in Genesis and Judges’, in Fewell D. N. (ed.), (1992), pp. 77-88.
  14. Roth Martha, 2003, Eretz Israel, 27
  15. Tsumura David T., 2009, Journal of Biblical Literature, 128
  16. Wenham Gordon, 1994, Genesis 16-50

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kraut, J.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Kraut, Judah
Venue
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2018-12
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
205-227
ISSN
  • 0309-0892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6728
DOI
10.1177/0309089217711029
OpenAlex
W2916677408
Semantic Scholar
1ebcd96151de9e439f3a6296b0ae1af9c5052929
Cited by
12
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Keywords
Reuben, Judah, Genesis, intertextuality, Jacob, Hebrew Bible

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review