The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engaging the global countryside: globalization, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place
Abstract
This article applies Massey's (2005) call for a relational understanding of space that can challenge aspatial readings of globalization to the study of globalization in a rural context. Critiquing existing rural research for tending towards studies of global commodity chains and overarching processes of globalization, it argues for more place-based studies of globalization as experienced in rural localities. The concept of the `global countryside' is introduced as a hypothetical space that represents the ultimate outcome of globalizing processes, yet it is noted that the characteristics of the `global countryside' find only partial articulation in particular rural spaces. Understanding this differentiated geography of rural globalization, it is argued, requires a closer understanding of how globalization remakes rural places, for which Massey's thesis provides a guide. The article thus examines the reconstitution of rural places under globalization, highlighting the interaction of local and global actors, and of human and non-human actants, to produce new hybrid forms and relations. As such, it is argued, the politics of globalization cannot be reduced to domination or subordination, but are instead a politics of negotiation and configuration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sassen, S. (1991) · Cited by 5,382
Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture
Robertson, R. (2000) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446280447 · Cited by 3,538
Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places.
Eriksen, T. H., & Hannerz, U. (1997) · The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · doi:10.2307/3034046 · Cited by 2,273
Friedmann, J. (1986) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1986.tb00231.x · Cited by 2,094
The McDonaldization of Society
(2001) · Explorations in Social Theory: From Metatheorizing to Rationalization · doi:10.4135/9781446220160.n11 · Cited by 1,665
Globalization: social theory and global culture
Rengger, N. J. (1993) · International Affairs · doi:10.2307/2622346 · Cited by 1,644
(2000) · Cited by 1,360
(2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,279
Global and world cities: a view from off the map
Robinson, J. (2002) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00397 · Cited by 1,252
AGRICULTURE AND THE STATE SYSTEM: The rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present
FRIEDMA, H., & McMICHAEL, P. (1989) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00360.x · Cited by 1,247
Cited by
Long, H., Tu, S., Ge, D., Li, T., & Liu, Y. (2016) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.011 · Cited by 623
Long, H., & Liu, Y. (2016) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.028 · Cited by 285
Liu, C., & Xu, M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182312759 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Woods, M.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485-507
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2041921976
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 66.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engaging the global countryside: globalization, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309132507079503
- The paper
- Woods, M. (2007). Engaging the global countryside: globalization, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507079503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.