The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adapting to flood risk under climate change
Abstract
Flooding is the most common natural hazard and third most damaging globally after storms and earthquakes. Anthropogenic climate change is expected to increase flood risk through more frequent heavy precipitation, increased catchment wetness and sea level rise. This paper reviews steps being taken by actors at international, national, regional and community levels to adapt to flood risk from tidal, fluvial, surface and groundwater sources. We refer to existing inventories, national and sectoral adaptation plans, flood inquiries, building and planning codes, city plans, research literature and international policy reviews. We distinguish between the enabling environment for adaptation and specific implementing measures to manage flood risk. Enabling includes routine monitoring, flood forecasting, data exchange, institutional reform, bridging organizations, contingency planning for disasters, insurance and legal incentives to reduce vulnerability. All such activities are ‘low regret’ in that they yield benefits regardless of the climate scenario but are not cost-free. Implementing includes climate safety factors for new build, upgrading resistance and resilience of existing infrastructure, modifying operating rules, development control, flood forecasting, temporary and permanent retreat from hazardous areas, periodic review and adaptive management. We identify evidence of both types of adaptation following the catastrophic 2010/11 flooding in Victoria, Australia. However, significant challenges remain for managing transboundary flood risk (at all scales), protecting existing property at risk from flooding, and ensuring equitable outcomes in terms of risk reduction for all. Adaptive management also raises questions about the wider preparedness of society to systematically monitor and respond to evolving flood risks and vulnerabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000
Pall, P., Aina, T., Stone, D. A., Stott, P. A., Nozawa, T., Hilberts, A. G. J., Lohmann, D., & Allen, M. R. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09762 · Cited by 871
Migration as an Adaptation to Climate Change
McLeman, R., & Smit, B. (2006) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-005-9000-7 · Cited by 811
Cited by
Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., & ter Maat, J. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006 · Cited by 1,745
Adapt or Perish: A Review of Planning Approaches for Adaptation under Deep Uncertainty
Walker, W., Haasnoot, M., & Kwakkel, J. (2013) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su5030955 · Cited by 607
Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research
Berrang-Ford, L., Pearce, T., & Ford, J. D. (2015) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0708-7 · Cited by 474
Defining Extreme Events: A Cross‐Disciplinary Review
McPhillips, L. E., Chang, H., Chester, M. V., Depietri, Y., Friedman, E., Grimm, N. B., Kominoski, J. S., McPhearson, T., Méndez‐Lázaro, P., Rosi, E. J., et al. (2018) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1002/2017ef000686 · Cited by 317
Adaptation Opportunities, Constraints, and Limits
(2015) · Climate Change 2014 Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415379.021 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilby, R. L., & Keenan, R.
- Venue
- Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-03-29
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 348-378
- ISSN
- 0309-1333 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0296
- OpenAlex
- W2121605199
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adapting to flood risk under climate change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309133312438908
- The paper
- Wilby, R. L., & Keenan, R. (2012). Adapting to flood risk under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312438908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.