Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters

Wulder, Mike·1998·Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment

Abstract

Forests are the most widely distributed ecosystem on the earth, affecting the lives of most humans daily, either as an economic good or an environmental regulator. As forests are a complex and widely distributed ecosystem, remote sensing provides a valuable means of monitoring them. Remote-sensing instruments allow for the collection of digital data through a range of scales in a synoptic and timely manner. Accordingly, a variety of image-processing techniques have been developed for the estimation of forest inventory and biophysical parameters from remotely sensed images. The use of remotely sensed images allows for the mapping of large areas efficiently and in a digital manner that allows for accuracy assessment and integration with geographic information systems. This article provides a summary of the image-processing methods which may be applied to remotely sensed data for the estimation of forest structural parameters while also acknowledging the various limitations that are presented. Current advancements in remote-sensor technology are increasing the information content of remotely sensed data and resulting in a need for new analysis techniques. These advances in sensor technology are occurring concurrently with changes in forest management practices, requiring detailed measurements intended to enable ecosystem-level management in a sustainable manner. This review of remote-sensing image analysis techniques, with reference to forest structural parameters, illustrates the dependence between spatial resolution to the level of detail of the parameters which may be extracted from remotely sensed imagery. As a result, the scope of a particular investigation will influence the type of imagery required and the limits to the detail of the parameters that may be estimated. The complexity of parameters that may be extracted can be increased through combinations of image-processing techniques. For example, multitemporal analysis of image radiance values or multispectral image classification maps may be analysed to undertake the assessment of such forest characteristics as area of forest disturbances, forest succession and development, or sustainability of forest management practices. Further, the combination of spectral and spatial information extraction techniques shows promise for increasing the accuracy of estimates of forest inventory and biophysical parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/030913339802200402

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Wulder, M.
Venue
Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
Published
1998-12
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
449-476
ISSN
  • 0309-1333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0296
OpenAlex
W2094735994
Cited by
381
References
58
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/030913339802200402
The paper
Wulder, M. (1998). Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339802200402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.