The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters
Abstract
Forests are the most widely distributed ecosystem on the earth, affecting the lives of most humans daily, either as an economic good or an environmental regulator. As forests are a complex and widely distributed ecosystem, remote sensing provides a valuable means of monitoring them. Remote-sensing instruments allow for the collection of digital data through a range of scales in a synoptic and timely manner. Accordingly, a variety of image-processing techniques have been developed for the estimation of forest inventory and biophysical parameters from remotely sensed images. The use of remotely sensed images allows for the mapping of large areas efficiently and in a digital manner that allows for accuracy assessment and integration with geographic information systems. This article provides a summary of the image-processing methods which may be applied to remotely sensed data for the estimation of forest structural parameters while also acknowledging the various limitations that are presented. Current advancements in remote-sensor technology are increasing the information content of remotely sensed data and resulting in a need for new analysis techniques. These advances in sensor technology are occurring concurrently with changes in forest management practices, requiring detailed measurements intended to enable ecosystem-level management in a sustainable manner. This review of remote-sensing image analysis techniques, with reference to forest structural parameters, illustrates the dependence between spatial resolution to the level of detail of the parameters which may be extracted from remotely sensed imagery. As a result, the scope of a particular investigation will influence the type of imagery required and the limits to the detail of the parameters that may be estimated. The complexity of parameters that may be extracted can be increased through combinations of image-processing techniques. For example, multitemporal analysis of image radiance values or multispectral image classification maps may be analysed to undertake the assessment of such forest characteristics as area of forest disturbances, forest succession and development, or sustainability of forest management practices. Further, the combination of spectral and spatial information extraction techniques shows promise for increasing the accuracy of estimates of forest inventory and biophysical parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA
Anselin, L. (1995) · Geographical Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x · Cited by 12,919
Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation
Tucker, C. J. (1979) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0 · Cited by 11,754
Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing
Nicol, J., King, B., Quattrochi, D., Dowman, I. J., Ehlers, M., & Xiaoli, D. (2007) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 9,325
A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)
Huete, A. R. (1988) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-x · Cited by 7,948
A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data
Congalton, R. G. (1991) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-b · Cited by 7,724
Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation
Wright, J., Lillesand, T. M., & Kiefer, R. W. (1980) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/634969 · Cited by 7,238
Matheron, G. (1963) · Economic Geology · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 · Cited by 4,845
A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data
Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., & Witmer, R. E. (1976) · Professional Paper · doi:10.3133/pp964 · Cited by 4,827
Remote Sensing And Image Interpretation
LILLESAND, T. M., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. (1979) · HAL · Cited by 4,463
Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment
Baret, F., & Guyot, G. (1991) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(91)90009-u · Cited by 1,984
Cited by
Object based image analysis for remote sensing
Blaschke, T. (2010) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004 · Cited by 4,482
Using Imaging Spectroscopy to Study Ecosystem Processes and Properties
USTIN, S. L., ROBERTS, D. A., GAMON, J. A., ASNER, G. P., & GREEN, R. O. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0523:uistse]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 580
Forest Monitoring Using Landsat Time Series Data: A Review
Banskota, A., Kayastha, N., Falkowski, M. J., Wulder, M. A., Froese, R. E., & White, J. C. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/07038992.2014.987376 · Cited by 419
Self-citationQuantifying forest cover loss in Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2000–2010, with Landsat ETM+ data
Potapov, P. V., Turubanova, S. A., Hansen, M. C., Adusei, B., Broich, M., Altstatt, A., Mane, L., & Justice, C. O. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.027 · Cited by 408
Wulder, M., Niemann, K. O., & Goodenough, D. G. (2000) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00101-2 · Cited by 393
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wulder, M.
- Venue
- Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 449-476
- ISSN
- 0309-1333 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0296
- OpenAlex
- W2094735994
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/030913339802200402
- The paper
- Wulder, M. (1998). Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339802200402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.