Cited by 99Survey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Introductory Guide to Survey Research in Anaesthesia

Open access
Jones, D., Story, D., Clavisi, O., Jones, R., Peyton, P.·2006·Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Abstract

Surveys allow convenient and inexpensive research. Surveys include mail-out questionnaires, email questionnaires, telephone interviews, and personal interviews. Despite a widespread perception that surveys are easy to conduct, good surveys need rigorous design, implementation and analysis. This requires substantial planning, time and effort. The most important step in designing a survey is to clearly define the question (s) the survey aims to answer. The target population, measured variables and types of associations being investigated should be specific and unambiguous. Investigators should concentrate on what they ‘need to know’ rather than what would be ‘nice to know’. During development surveys should be piloted to identify problems. The main goal when implementing a survey is to maximize the response rate to avoid misleading results. Evidence-based strategies, including brief personalized surveys with stamped return envelopes, can be used to maximize the response rate. A poorly conducted survey can lead to misleading or invalid conclusions and may undermine participation in subsequent surveys by the target population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0310057x0603400219

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comprehensive reporting guidelines for survey research are limited, and substantial variabilities and inconsistencies exist in the reporting of survey studies.

    “Although many surveys have been published in high-impact journals, comprehensive reporting guidelines for survey research are limited 13, 14 and substantial variabilities and inconsistencies can be identified in the reporting of survey studies.”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Alreck P.L., 1995, The Survey Research Handbook.
  2. Passmore C., 2002, Fam Med, 34, 281
  3. 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02961.x · DOI
  4. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009955 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/ije/27.6.935 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1372 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00583.x · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0959-289X(93)90052-J · DOI
  9. 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136772.38754.01 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0310057X0303100510 · DOI
  11. Brown J., 2003, Medsurg Nurs, 12, 95
  12. 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00422.x · DOI
  13. 10.1007/BF03018448 · DOI
  14. Bowling A., 2000, Research methods in health: investigating health and health services.
  15. 10.1093/intqhc/mzg031 · DOI
  16. 10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.015-az014.x · DOI
  18. 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160 · DOI
  19. 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1437 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/intqhc/11.4.319 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/00000542-200312000-00003 · DOI
  22. Seguin R., 2004, Can Fam Physician, 50, 414
  23. 10.1007/BF03018307 · DOI
  24. 10.1136/bmj.323.7326.1403 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00215-8 · DOI
  26. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1168 · DOI
  27. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183 · DOI
  28. 10.1186/1472-6963-4-31 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00051-7 · DOI
  30. 10.1300/J026v20n04_03 · DOI
  31. 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.02955.x · DOI
  32. National Health and Medical Research Council., 1999, National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans.
  33. 10.4135/9781849209250 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jones, D., Story, D., Clavisi, O., Jones, R., & Peyton, P.
Affiliations
  • Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Published
2006-04
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
245-253
ISSN
  • 0310-057X (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-0271
OpenAlex
W206747666
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
survey research, survey design, questionnaire development, piloting, response rate, telephone interviews, anesthesia research, survey implementation
MeSH terms
Anesthesiology, Data Collection, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review