Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prediction of Difficult Laryngoscopy: An Assessment of the Thyromental Distance and Mallampati Predictive Tests

Open access
Butler, P. J., Dhara, S. S.·1992·Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Abstract

Two hundred and fifty patients were assessed preoperatively using the Mallampati classification and by measuring their thyromental distances. The ease or difficulty of direct laryngoscopy was assessed at the time of induction of anaesthesia. Retrognathia was seen in 15.6% of patients and the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy without external laryngeal pressure was 8.2%. It was found that both assessments predicted less than two in three difficult laryngoscopies and had high false positive rates. It was found that external laryngeal pressure often improved the view of the glottis in difficult laryngoscopies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0310057x9202000202

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Butler, P. J., & Dhara, S. S.
Venue
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Published
1992-05
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
139-142
ISSN
  • 0310-057X (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-0271
OpenAlex
W126222877
Cited by
180
References
0
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Difficult Laryngoscopy: An Assessment of the Thyromental Distance and Mallampati Predictive Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0310057x9202000202
The paper
Butler, P. J., & Dhara, S. S. (1992). Prediction of Difficult Laryngoscopy: An Assessment of the Thyromental Distance and Mallampati Predictive Tests. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9202000202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.