The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia and persistent idiopathic facial pain: A population-based study
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the lifetime prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) in a population-based sample in Germany. Methods: A total of 3336 responders of 6000 contacted inhabitants of the city of Essen in Germany were screened using a self-assessment questionnaire. 327 individuals, who reported recurrent facial pain and randomly selected 150 (5% of 3009) screening negative subjects, received a phone interview by one of six neurologists and if necessary a face-to-face examination. Those with suspected TN or PIFP following the phone interview underwent neurological examination by two neurologists who were unaware of the presumed diagnosis. A random group of 25 (10% of 247) phone interview negative subjects was examined face-to-face. All suspected cases of PIFP received otorhinolaryngological examination and diagnostic cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In TN patients the number of vessel-nerve contacts was determined by thin-slice cranial MRI. Results: Lifetime prevalence of TN was estimated to be 0.3% [10 of 3336; 95% CI 0.1–0.5%], of PIFP 0.03% [1 of 3336; 95% CI < 0.08%]. Thin-slice cranial MRI detected five vessel-nerve contacts and no symptomatic lesions in the 10 TN patients. Conclusions: This large population-based study revealed that TN and PIFP are rare facial pain disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MacDonald, B. K. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.4.665 · Cited by 858 · cited 1×
“Lifetime prevalence estimate of TN in Britain was based on information obtained from general practices and the British National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery with a subsequent clinical re-evaluation of the suspected cases (5).”
Method
Cited by
Trigeminal Neuralgia – A Prospective Systematic Study of Clinical Characteristics in 158 Patients
Maarbjerg, S., Gozalov, A., Olesen, J., & Bendtsen, L. (2014) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.12441 · Cited by 351
Murugesan, I., T.N., U., & Ramalingam, K. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.69258 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, D., Obermann, M., Yoon, M.-S., Poitz, F., Hansen, N., Slomke, M.-A., Dommes, P., Gizewski, E., Diener, H.-C., & Katsarava, Z.
- Venue
- Cephalalgia
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-09-29
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1542-1548
- ISSN
- 0333-1024 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2982
- OpenAlex
- W2001819587
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia and persistent idiopathic facial pain: A population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0333102411424619
- The paper
- Mueller, D., Obermann, M., Yoon, M.-S., Poitz, F., Hansen, N., Slomke, M.-A., Dommes, P., Gizewski, E., Diener, H.-C., & Katsarava, Z. (2011). Prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia and persistent idiopathic facial pain: A population-based study. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102411424619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.