Cited by 116Traffic and Road SafetyTraffic control and managementTransportation Systems and Logistics

Extracting Useful Information from Basic Safety Message Data: An Empirical Study of Driving Volatility Measures and Crash Frequency at Intersections

Open access
Kamrani, Mohsen, Arvin, Ramin, Khattak, Asad J.·2018·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

With the emergence of high-frequency connected and automated vehicle data, analysts can extract useful information from them. To this end, the concept of “driving volatility” is defined and explored as deviation from the norm. Several measures of dispersion and variation can be computed in different ways using vehicles’ instantaneous speed, acceleration, and jerk observed at intersections. This study explores different measures of volatility, representing newly available surrogate measures of safety, by combining data from the Michigan Safety Pilot Deployment of connected vehicles with crash and inventory data at several intersections. For each intersection, 37 different measures of volatility were calculated. These volatilities were then used to explain crash frequencies at intersection by estimating fixed and random parameter Poisson regression models. Given that volatility reflects the degree to which vehicles move, erratic movements are expected to increase crash risk. Results show that an increase in three measures of driving volatility are positively associated with higher intersection crash frequency, controlling for exposure variables and geometric features. More intersection crashes were associated with higher percentages of vehicle data points (speed & acceleration) lying beyond threshold-bands. These bands were created using mean plus two standard deviations. Furthermore, a higher magnitude of time-varying stochastic volatility of vehicle speeds when they pass through the intersection is associated with higher crash frequencies. These measures can be used to locate intersections with high driving volatilities. A deeper analysis of these intersections can be undertaken, and proactive safety countermeasures considered to enhance safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0361198118773869

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VF is capable of quantitatively analyzing irregular changes in indicators over time and has been reported to be effectively used for driving behavior analysis.

    “VF is capable of quantitatively analyzing irregular changes in the indicators over time and has been reported to be effectively used for driving behavior analysis [46,47].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1][1] 'Brian' Park, B., I. Yun, and K. Ahn. Stochastic optimization for sustainable traffic signal control. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2009, pp. 263-284.
  2. [3][3] Ghiasi, A., O. Hussain, Z. S. Qian, and X. Li. A mixed traffic capacity analysis and lane management model for connected automated vehicles: A Markov chain method. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 106, 2017, pp. 266-292.
  3. [7][7] Arvin, R., M. Khademi, and H. Razi-Ardakani. Study on mobile phone use while driving in a sample of Iranian drivers. International journal of injury control and safety promotion, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2017, pp. 256-262. -
  4. [8][8] Wali, B., A. J. Khattak, and J. Xu. Contributory fault and level of personal injury to drivers involved in head-on collisions: application of copula-based bivariate ordinal models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 110, 2018, pp. 101-114. -
  5. [9][9] Lajunen, T., D. Parker, and S. G. Stradling. Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1998, pp. 107-121. -
  6. [10][10] Özkan, T., T. Lajunen, D. Parker, N. Sümer, and H. Summala. Symmetric relationship between self and others in aggressive driving across gender and countries. Traffic injury prevention, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2010, pp. 228-239. -
  7. [12][12] Ghasemzadeh, A., and M. M. Ahmed. Drivers' Lane-Keeping Ability in Heavy Rain: Preliminary Investigation Using SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , No. 2663, 2017, pp. 99-108. -
  8. [15][15] De Vlieger, I., D. De Keukeleere, and J. Kretzschmar. Environmental effects of driving behaviour and congestion related to passenger cars. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 34, No. 27, 2000, pp. 46494655. -
  9. [16][16] Han, I., and K. Yang. Characteristic analysis for cognition of dangerous driving using automobile black boxes. International journal of automotive technology, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2009, pp. 597-605. -
  10. [17][17] Murphey, Y. L., R. Milton, and L. Kiliaris. Driver's style classification using jerk analysis.In Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Vehicular Systems, 2009. CIVVS'09. IEEE Workshop on , IEEE, 2009. pp. 23-28. -
  11. [18][18] Bagdadi, O., and A. Várhelyi. Development of a method for detecting jerks in safety critical events. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 83-91. -
  12. [19][19] Feng, F., S. Bao, J. R. Sayer, C. Flannagan, M. Manser, and R. Wunderlich. Can vehicle longitudinal jerk be used to identify aggressive drivers? An examination using naturalistic driving data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 104, 2017, pp. 125-136. -
  13. [20][20] Stewart, A. E., and J. H. Lord. Motor vehicle crash versus accident: a change in terminology is necessary. Journal of traumatic stress, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2002, pp. 333-335. -
  14. [21][21] Khattak, A. J., and B. Wali. Analysis of volatility in driving regimes extracted from basic safety messages transmitted between connected vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 84, 2017, pp. 48-73. -
  15. [22][22] Kamrani, M., B. Wali, and A. J. Khattak. Can Data Generated by Connected Vehicles Enhance Safety? Proactive Approach to Intersection Safety Management. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , No. 2659, 2017, pp. 80-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2659-09. - · DOI
  16. [24][24] Huber, P. J. Robust statistics . John Wiley & Sons, 2005. -
  17. [25][25] Bonett, D. G. Confidence interval for a coefficient of quartile variation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 50, No. 11, 2006, pp. 2953-2957. -
  18. [29][29] Anastasopoulos, P. C., and F. L. Mannering. A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2009, pp. 153-159. -
  19. [31][31] Azizi, L., and A. Sheikholeslami. Safety Effect of U-Turn Conversions in Tehran: Empirical Bayes Observational Before-and-After Study and Crash Prediction Models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 1, 2012, pp. 101-108. -
  20. [32][32] Greene, W. H. Econometric analysis . Pearson Education India, 2003. -
  21. [33][33] Washington, S. P., M. G. Karlaftis, and F. Mannering. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis . CRC press, 2010. -
  22. [34][34] Wali, B., A. Ahmed, and N. Ahmad. An ordered-probit analysis of enforcement of road speed limits.In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport , Thomas Telford Ltd, 2017. pp. 1-10.
  23. [35][35] Li, X., A. J. Khattak, and B. Wali. Role of Multiagency Response and On-Scene Times in Large- Scale Traffic Incidents. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , No. 2616, 2017, pp. 39-48. -
  24. [36][36] Jamali, A., and Y . Wang. Estimating pedestrian exposure for small urban and rural areas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , No. 2661, 2017, pp. 8494. -
  25. [37][37] Wang, Y., K. Kockelman, and A. Jamali. A Synthesis of Spatial Models for Multivariate Count Responses.In Regional Research Frontiers-Vol. 2 , Springer, 2017. pp. 221-237. -
  26. [38][38] Wali, B., A. J. Khattak, J. Waters, D. Chimba, and X. Li. Development of Safety Performance Functions: Incorporating Unobserved Heterogeneity and Functional Form Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , 2018. Accepted. -
  27. [39][39] Bhat, C. R. Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 37, No. 9, 2003, pp. 837-855. -
  28. [41][41] Poirier, J., F. Ludwig, and S. Motamedi. Traffic Light Assistant Simulation: Foggy Weather.In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation , Springer, 2017. pp. 1129-1138.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamrani, M., Arvin, R., & Khattak, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Kamrani, Mohsen
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2018-05-15
Volume
2672
Issue
38
Pages
290-301
ISSN
  • 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4052
OpenAlex
W2792648232
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
FWCI
12.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Transportation Systems and Logistics
Keywords
connected and automated vehicles, vehicle speed, acceleration, jerk, stochastic volatility, surrogate safety measures, crash risk, road safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review