Extracting Useful Information from Basic Safety Message Data: An Empirical Study of Driving Volatility Measures and Crash Frequency at Intersections
Open accessAbstract
With the emergence of high-frequency connected and automated vehicle data, analysts can extract useful information from them. To this end, the concept of “driving volatility” is defined and explored as deviation from the norm. Several measures of dispersion and variation can be computed in different ways using vehicles’ instantaneous speed, acceleration, and jerk observed at intersections. This study explores different measures of volatility, representing newly available surrogate measures of safety, by combining data from the Michigan Safety Pilot Deployment of connected vehicles with crash and inventory data at several intersections. For each intersection, 37 different measures of volatility were calculated. These volatilities were then used to explain crash frequencies at intersection by estimating fixed and random parameter Poisson regression models. Given that volatility reflects the degree to which vehicles move, erratic movements are expected to increase crash risk. Results show that an increase in three measures of driving volatility are positively associated with higher intersection crash frequency, controlling for exposure variables and geometric features. More intersection crashes were associated with higher percentages of vehicle data points (speed & acceleration) lying beyond threshold-bands. These bands were created using mean plus two standard deviations. Furthermore, a higher magnitude of time-varying stochastic volatility of vehicle speeds when they pass through the intersection is associated with higher crash frequencies. These measures can be used to locate intersections with high driving volatilities. A deeper analysis of these intersections can be undertaken, and proactive safety countermeasures considered to enhance safety.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
VF is capable of quantitatively analyzing irregular changes in indicators over time and has been reported to be effectively used for driving behavior analysis.
“VF is capable of quantitatively analyzing irregular changes in the indicators over time and has been reported to be effectively used for driving behavior analysis [46,47].”
From Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Safety by Operational Design Domains (ODD) in Mixed Traffic (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- [1][1] 'Brian' Park, B., I. Yun, and K. Ahn. Stochastic optimization for sustainable traffic signal control. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2009, pp. 263-284.
- [3][3] Ghiasi, A., O. Hussain, Z. S. Qian, and X. Li. A mixed traffic capacity analysis and lane management model for connected automated vehicles: A Markov chain method. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 106, 2017, pp. 266-292.
- [7][7] Arvin, R., M. Khademi, and H. Razi-Ardakani. Study on mobile phone use while driving in a sample of Iranian drivers. International journal of injury control and safety promotion, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2017, pp. 256-262. -
- [8][8] Wali, B., A. J. Khattak, and J. Xu. Contributory fault and level of personal injury to drivers involved in head-on collisions: application of copula-based bivariate ordinal models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 110, 2018, pp. 101-114. -
- [9][9] Lajunen, T., D. Parker, and S. G. Stradling. Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1998, pp. 107-121. -
- [10][10] Özkan, T., T. Lajunen, D. Parker, N. Sümer, and H. Summala. Symmetric relationship between self and others in aggressive driving across gender and countries. Traffic injury prevention, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2010, pp. 228-239. -
- [12][12] Ghasemzadeh, A., and M. M. Ahmed. Drivers' Lane-Keeping Ability in Heavy Rain: Preliminary Investigation Using SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , No. 2663, 2017, pp. 99-108. -
- [15][15] De Vlieger, I., D. De Keukeleere, and J. Kretzschmar. Environmental effects of driving behaviour and congestion related to passenger cars. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 34, No. 27, 2000, pp. 46494655. -
- [16][16] Han, I., and K. Yang. Characteristic analysis for cognition of dangerous driving using automobile black boxes. International journal of automotive technology, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2009, pp. 597-605. -
- [17][17] Murphey, Y. L., R. Milton, and L. Kiliaris. Driver's style classification using jerk analysis.In Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Vehicular Systems, 2009. CIVVS'09. IEEE Workshop on , IEEE, 2009. pp. 23-28. -
- [18][18] Bagdadi, O., and A. Várhelyi. Development of a method for detecting jerks in safety critical events. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 83-91. -
- [19][19] Feng, F., S. Bao, J. R. Sayer, C. Flannagan, M. Manser, and R. Wunderlich. Can vehicle longitudinal jerk be used to identify aggressive drivers? An examination using naturalistic driving data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 104, 2017, pp. 125-136. -
- [20][20] Stewart, A. E., and J. H. Lord. Motor vehicle crash versus accident: a change in terminology is necessary. Journal of traumatic stress, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2002, pp. 333-335. -
- [21][21] Khattak, A. J., and B. Wali. Analysis of volatility in driving regimes extracted from basic safety messages transmitted between connected vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 84, 2017, pp. 48-73. -
- [22][22] Kamrani, M., B. Wali, and A. J. Khattak. Can Data Generated by Connected Vehicles Enhance Safety? Proactive Approach to Intersection Safety Management. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , No. 2659, 2017, pp. 80-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2659-09. - · DOI
- [24][24] Huber, P. J. Robust statistics . John Wiley & Sons, 2005. -
- [25][25] Bonett, D. G. Confidence interval for a coefficient of quartile variation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 50, No. 11, 2006, pp. 2953-2957. -
- [29][29] Anastasopoulos, P. C., and F. L. Mannering. A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2009, pp. 153-159. -
- [31][31] Azizi, L., and A. Sheikholeslami. Safety Effect of U-Turn Conversions in Tehran: Empirical Bayes Observational Before-and-After Study and Crash Prediction Models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 1, 2012, pp. 101-108. -
- [32][32] Greene, W. H. Econometric analysis . Pearson Education India, 2003. -
- [33][33] Washington, S. P., M. G. Karlaftis, and F. Mannering. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis . CRC press, 2010. -
- [34][34] Wali, B., A. Ahmed, and N. Ahmad. An ordered-probit analysis of enforcement of road speed limits.In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport , Thomas Telford Ltd, 2017. pp. 1-10.
- [35][35] Li, X., A. J. Khattak, and B. Wali. Role of Multiagency Response and On-Scene Times in Large- Scale Traffic Incidents. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , No. 2616, 2017, pp. 39-48. -
- [36][36] Jamali, A., and Y . Wang. Estimating pedestrian exposure for small urban and rural areas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , No. 2661, 2017, pp. 8494. -
- [37][37] Wang, Y., K. Kockelman, and A. Jamali. A Synthesis of Spatial Models for Multivariate Count Responses.In Regional Research Frontiers-Vol. 2 , Springer, 2017. pp. 221-237. -
- [38][38] Wali, B., A. J. Khattak, J. Waters, D. Chimba, and X. Li. Development of Safety Performance Functions: Incorporating Unobserved Heterogeneity and Functional Form Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , 2018. Accepted. -
- [39][39] Bhat, C. R. Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 37, No. 9, 2003, pp. 837-855. -
- [41][41] Poirier, J., F. Ludwig, and S. Motamedi. Traffic Light Assistant Simulation: Foggy Weather.In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation , Springer, 2017. pp. 1129-1138.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mahdinia, I., Mohammadnazar, A., Arvin, R., & Khattak, A. J. (2021) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106006 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationJo, Y., Jang, J., Ko, J., & Oh, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3156923 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Safety by Operational Design Domains (ODD) in Mixed Traffic
Kim, H., Ko, J., Oh, C., & Kim, S. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16229672 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…standard deviation and time-varying stochastic volatility (VF), which can quantitatively estimate changes in driving behavior VF is capable of quantitatively analyzing irregular changes in the indicators over time and has been reported to be e ff ectively used for driving behavior analysis [46,47].”
- Authors
- Kamrani, M., Arvin, R., & Khattak, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kamrani, Mohsen
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-05-15
- Volume
- 2672
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 290-301
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2792648232
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 12.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Transportation Systems and Logistics
- Keywords
- connected and automated vehicles, vehicle speed, acceleration, jerk, stochastic volatility, surrogate safety measures, crash risk, road safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review