Cited by 43Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationGeotechnical and construction materials studiesConcrete and Cement Materials Research

Improvement of Strength and Volume-Change Properties of Expansive Clays with Geopolymer Treatment

Samuel, Rinu, Puppala, Anand J., Banerjee, Aritra, Huang, Oscar, Radovic, Miladin, Chakraborty, Sayantan·2021·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

Expansive soils are conventionally treated with chemical stabilizers manufactured by energy-intensive processes that significantly contribute to carbon dioxide emissions globally. Geopolymers, which are synthesized from industrial byproducts rich in aluminosilicates, are a viable alternative to conventional treatments, as they are eco-friendly and sustainable. In this study, a metakaolin-based geopolymer was synthesized, and its effects on the strength and volume-change behavior of two native expansive soils from Texas, with a plasticity index over 20 were investigated. This paper elaborates on the geopolymerization process, synthesis of the metakaolin-based geopolymer, specimen preparation, and geopolymer treatment of soils. Comprehensive material testing revealed two clays with a plasticity index over 20. They were each treated with three dosages of the metakaolin-based geopolymer and cured in 100% relative humidity for three different curing periods. The efficiency of geopolymer treatment was determined by testing the control and geopolymer-treated soils for unconfined compressive strength (UCS), one-dimensional swell, and linear shrinkage. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) imaging was performed on the synthesized geopolymer, as well as on the control and geopolymer-treated soils, to detect microstructural changes caused by geopolymerization. A significant increase in UCS and reduction in swelling and shrinkage were observed for both geopolymer-treated soils, within a curing period of only 7 days. The FESEM imaging provided new insights on the structure of geopolymers and evidence of geopolymer formation in treated soils. In conclusion, the metakaolin-based geopolymer has strong potential as a lower-carbon-footprint alternative to conventional stabilizers for expansive soils.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/03611981211001842

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samuel, R., Puppala, A. J., Banerjee, A., Huang, O., Radovic, M., & Chakraborty, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
  • Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (IN)
Corresponding author
Puppala, Anand J.
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2021-03-27
Volume
2675
Issue
9
Pages
308-320
ISSN
  • 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4052
OpenAlex
W3146217304
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
expansive clay, expansive soil, geopolymer stabilization, metakaolin-based geopolymer, unconfined compressive strength, linear shrinkage, curing time, chemical stabilizers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review