The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Field Studies of Pedestrian Walking Speed and Start-Up Time
Abstract
Today's traffic environment is not well adapted to the needs of the older pedestrian. Unfortunately, except in the case of children, little is known about the characteristics and behavior of pedestrians. Although the simple fact that older pedestrians walk more slowly than younger ones is easily supported by field data, existing data on walking speeds and start-up time (i.e., the time from the onset of a Walk signal until the pedestrian steps off the curb) have many shortcomings. A series of field studies was conducted to quantify the walking speed and start-up time of pedestrians of various ages under different conditions. Sixteen crosswalks in four urban areas were studied. Data were collected on walking speeds and start-up times relative to site and environmental factors, including street width, posted speed, curb height, grade, number of vehicle travel lanes, signal cycle length, pedestrian-signal type, street functional classification, crosswalk type, and channelization. Data on a subject group of pedestrians who appeared to be 65 years of age or older and a control group of pedestrians under age 65 were collected. Results indicate a broad range of walking speeds among pedestrians. The 15th-percentile walking speed for younger pedestrians (ages 14 to 64) was 1.25 m/sec (4.09 ft/sec); for older pedestrians (ages 65 and over) it was 0.97 m/sec (3.19 ft/sec). For design purposes values of 1.22 m/sec (4 ft/sec) for younger pedestrians and 0.91 m/sec (3 ft/sec) for older pedestrians are appropriate. Results also indicated that walking rates are influenced by a variety of factors, including the functional classification and vehicle volumes on the street being crossed, the street width, weather conditions, the number of pedestrians crossing in a group, the signal cycle length, the timing of the various pedestrian-signal phases, whether right turn on red is allowed, pedestrian signals, medians, curb cuts, crosswalk markings, stop lines, and on-street parking. However, for each of these factors, the effect on crossing speeds, although statistically significant, is not meaningful for design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians
Habibovic, A., Lundgren, V. M., Andersson, J., Klingegård, M., Lagström, T., Sirkka, A., Fagerlönn, J., Edgren, C., Fredriksson, R., Krupenia, S., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01336 · Cited by 298
Cheng, T., Venugopal, M., Teizer, J., & Vela, P. A. (2011) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05.001 · Cited by 256
Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds
Gallup, A. C., Hale, J. J., Sumpter, D. J. T., Garnier, S., Kacelnik, A., Krebs, J. R., & Couzin, I. D. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116141109 · Cited by 234
Wood, N. J., & Schmidtlein, M. C. (2012) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9994-2 · Cited by 133
Liang, S., Leng, H., Yuan, Q., Wang, B., & Yuan, C. (2020) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106811 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Knoblauch, R. L., Pietrucha, M. T., & Nitzburg, M.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 1538
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-38
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2096187762
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field Studies of Pedestrian Walking Speed and Start-Up Time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0361198196153800104
- The paper
- Knoblauch, R. L., Pietrucha, M. T., & Nitzburg, M. (1996). Field Studies of Pedestrian Walking Speed and Start-Up Time. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196153800104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.