Stereotype Threat Among Women in Finance: Negative Effects on Identity, Workplace Well-Being, and Recruiting
Abstract
Because women are in the minority in masculine fields like finance and banking, women in these fields may experience stereotype threat or the concern about being negatively stereotyped in their workplace. Research demonstrates that stereotype threat among women in management and accounting leads to negative job attitudes and intentions to quit via its effects on identity separation, or the perception that one’s gender identity is incompatible with one’s work identity. The current work extends this research to related outcomes among women in finance. In this study, 512 women working in finance completed a survey about their work environment, their well-being at work, and whether they would recommend the field of finance to younger women. Results showed that, to the extent women experienced stereotype threat in their work environment, they reported diminished well-being at work and were less likely to recommend their field to other women, and these outcomes were mediated by identity separation. Recruitment and retention of women into fields where they have been historically underrepresented is key to achieving the “critical mass” of women necessary to reduce perceptions of tokenism as well as stereotyping and devaluing of women. The current work sheds light on psychological factors that affect these outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In women in finance, greater stereotype threat was associated with diminished well-being and lower likelihood of recommending a finance career to other women, mediated by identity separation.
“In a recent study of women in finance, researchers showed that Managing to clear the air 15 greater feelings of stereotype threat were associated with diminished well-being and a lower likelihood of recommending a career in finance to other women, and these relationships were mediated by identity separation (von Hippel, Sekaquaptewa, & McFarlane, 2015).”
From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as von Hippel, Sekaquaptewa, & McFarlane, 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- von Hippel, C., Sekaquaptewa, D., & McFarlane, M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- University of Michigan (US)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- ORCID
- Sekaquaptewa, Denise
- Venue
- Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-03-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 405-414
- ISSN
- 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6402
- OpenAlex
- W2068215899
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 17.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Women Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- stereotype threat, women in finance, employee well-being, gender underrepresentation, recruitment and retention of women, tokenism, women in banking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review