Cited by 85Gender Diversity and InequalityCareer Development and DiversitySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Stereotype Threat Among Women in Finance: Negative Effects on Identity, Workplace Well-Being, and Recruiting

von Hippel, Courtney, Sekaquaptewa, Denise, McFarlane, Matthew·2015·Psychology of Women Quarterly

Abstract

Because women are in the minority in masculine fields like finance and banking, women in these fields may experience stereotype threat or the concern about being negatively stereotyped in their workplace. Research demonstrates that stereotype threat among women in management and accounting leads to negative job attitudes and intentions to quit via its effects on identity separation, or the perception that one’s gender identity is incompatible with one’s work identity. The current work extends this research to related outcomes among women in finance. In this study, 512 women working in finance completed a survey about their work environment, their well-being at work, and whether they would recommend the field of finance to younger women. Results showed that, to the extent women experienced stereotype threat in their work environment, they reported diminished well-being at work and were less likely to recommend their field to other women, and these outcomes were mediated by identity separation. Recruitment and retention of women into fields where they have been historically underrepresented is key to achieving the “critical mass” of women necessary to reduce perceptions of tokenism as well as stereotyping and devaluing of women. The current work sheds light on psychological factors that affect these outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0361684315574501

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In women in finance, greater stereotype threat was associated with diminished well-being and lower likelihood of recommending a finance career to other women, mediated by identity separation.

    “In a recent study of women in finance, researchers showed that Managing to clear the air 15 greater feelings of stereotype threat were associated with diminished well-being and a lower likelihood of recommending a career in finance to other women, and these relationships were mediated by identity separation (von Hippel, Sekaquaptewa, & McFarlane, 2015).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as von Hippel, Sekaquaptewa, & McFarlane, 2015

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 85

Authors
von Hippel, C., Sekaquaptewa, D., & McFarlane, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Published
2015-03-02
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
405-414
ISSN
  • 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6402
OpenAlex
W2068215899
Cited by
85
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
17.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Women Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
stereotype threat, women in finance, employee well-being, gender underrepresentation, recruitment and retention of women, tokenism, women in banking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review