The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form
Abstract
A committee of international knee experts created the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form, which is a knee-specific, rather than a disease-specific, measure of symptoms, function, and sports activity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the new International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. To provide evidence for reliability and validity, we administered the final version of the form, along with the Short Form-36, to 533 patients with a variety of knee problems. Analyses were performed to determine reliability, validity, and differential item function related to age, sex, and diagnosis. Factor analysis revealed a single dominant component, making it reasonable to combine all questions into a single score. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were 0.92 and 0.95, respectively. Based on test-retest reliability, the value for a true change in the score was 9.0 points. The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score was related to concurrent measures of physical function (r = 0.47 to 0.66) but not to emotional function (r = 0.16 to 0.26). Analysis of differential item function indicated that the questions functioned similarly for men versus women, young versus old, and for those with different diagnoses. In conclusion, the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form is a reliable and valid knee-specific measure of symptoms, function, and sports activity that is appropriate for patients with a wide variety of knee problems. Use of this instrument will permit comparisons of outcome across groups with different knee problems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LCA holds significant potential to uncover complicated recovery profiles following ACL injuries.
“Building on progress in biopsychosocial characterization, recent developments in person-centered statistical methodologies, particularly latent class analysis (LCA), hold significant potential to uncover complicated recovery profiles following ACL injuries.21,27,35,42,53”
From Biopsychosocial profiles following ACL reconstruction: A latent class analysis of barriers to return-to-activity (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Rachel Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004 · Cited by 4,458
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Anderson AF, 1993, Am J Sports Med, 21, 67, 10.1177/036354659302100112 · DOI
- 10.1177/03635465990270040201 · DOI
- Bellamy N., 1988, J Rheumatol, 15, 1833
- 10.1177/036354659101900215 · DOI
- 10.1177/036354659101900209 · DOI
- 10.2519/jospt.1998.27.3.219 · DOI
- 10.2106/00004623-197456060-00009 · DOI
- Feagin JA, 1983, Clin Orthop, 172, 143
- Godshall RW, 1974, J Bone Joint Surg, 56, 1316
- 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01560215 · DOI
- 10.2106/00004623-197355050-00002 · DOI
- 10.2106/00004623-199808000-00006 · DOI
- 10.1093/ptj/76.11.1178 · DOI
- 10.2106/00004623-197052070-00002 · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/036354658201000306 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/03635465980260030201 · DOI
- Nitko AJ, 1983, Educational Tests and Measurement: An Introduction
- 10.1177/036354659101900212 · DOI
- 10.1177/036354659101900210 · DOI
- 10.2106/00004623-198971030-00027 · DOI
- 10.2106/00004623-195537010-00001 · DOI
- Sangha O., 1995, Arthritis Rheum, 38, S177
- 10.1177/036354659502300604 · DOI
- 10.1177/036354659602400214 · DOI
- Sharma S., 1996, Applied Multivariate Techniques
- 10.2106/00004623-196850020-00002 · DOI
- 10.1097/00003086-198509000-00007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- Crocker L., 1986, Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory
- De Ayala RJ, 1993, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 172
- 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00543.x · DOI
- Joreskog KG, 1993, LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with SIMPLIS Command Language
- Linacre JM, 1998, A User's Guide to BIGSTEPS WINSTEPS. Rasch-Model Computer Program
- Sharma S., 1996, Applied Multivariate Techniques
Cited by
Sorted by citations
George, S. Z., Beneciuk, J. M., Lentz, T. A., Wu, S. S., Dai, Y., Bialosky, J. E., & Zeppieri, G. (2018) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7811 · Cited by 79
Petushek, E., Harkey, M. S., Santiago, K., Stamm, A., Baez, S., Diekfuss, J. A., Myer, G. D., & Kuenze, C. (2025) · Physical Therapy in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2025.08.004 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Irrgang, J. J., Anderson, A. F., Boland, A. L., Harner, C. D., Kurosaka, M., Neyret, P., Richmond, J. C., & Shelborne, K. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- University of Pittsburgh Methodist Sports Medicine Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 600-613
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2162321417
- Cited by
- 2,204
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 156 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 165 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 76
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Keywords
- knee symptoms, knee function, sports activities, reliability statistics, validity, Short Form-36, factor analysis, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, patient-reported outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Knee, Knee Injuries, Medical Records, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Trauma Severity Indices, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review