Cited by 2,204Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form

Abstract

A committee of international knee experts created the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form, which is a knee-specific, rather than a disease-specific, measure of symptoms, function, and sports activity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the new International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. To provide evidence for reliability and validity, we administered the final version of the form, along with the Short Form-36, to 533 patients with a variety of knee problems. Analyses were performed to determine reliability, validity, and differential item function related to age, sex, and diagnosis. Factor analysis revealed a single dominant component, making it reasonable to combine all questions into a single score. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were 0.92 and 0.95, respectively. Based on test-retest reliability, the value for a true change in the score was 9.0 points. The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score was related to concurrent measures of physical function (r = 0.47 to 0.66) but not to emotional function (r = 0.16 to 0.26). Analysis of differential item function indicated that the questions functioned similarly for men versus women, young versus old, and for those with different diagnoses. In conclusion, the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form is a reliable and valid knee-specific measure of symptoms, function, and sports activity that is appropriate for patients with a wide variety of knee problems. Use of this instrument will permit comparisons of outcome across groups with different knee problems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/03635465010290051301

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LCA holds significant potential to uncover complicated recovery profiles following ACL injuries.

    “Building on progress in biopsychosocial characterization, recent developments in person-centered statistical methodologies, particularly latent class analysis (LCA), hold significant potential to uncover complicated recovery profiles following ACL injuries.21,27,35,42,53”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Anderson AF, 1993, Am J Sports Med, 21, 67, 10.1177/036354659302100112 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/03635465990270040201 · DOI
  3. Bellamy N., 1988, J Rheumatol, 15, 1833
  4. 10.1177/036354659101900215 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/036354659101900209 · DOI
  6. 10.2519/jospt.1998.27.3.219 · DOI
  7. 10.2106/00004623-197456060-00009 · DOI
  8. Feagin JA, 1983, Clin Orthop, 172, 143
  9. Godshall RW, 1974, J Bone Joint Surg, 56, 1316
  10. 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF01560215 · DOI
  12. 10.2106/00004623-197355050-00002 · DOI
  13. 10.2106/00004623-199808000-00006 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/ptj/76.11.1178 · DOI
  15. 10.2106/00004623-197052070-00002 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1177/036354658201000306 · DOI
  18. 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/03635465980260030201 · DOI
  20. Nitko AJ, 1983, Educational Tests and Measurement: An Introduction
  21. 10.1177/036354659101900212 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/036354659101900210 · DOI
  23. 10.2106/00004623-198971030-00027 · DOI
  24. 10.2106/00004623-195537010-00001 · DOI
  25. Sangha O., 1995, Arthritis Rheum, 38, S177
  26. 10.1177/036354659502300604 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/036354659602400214 · DOI
  28. Sharma S., 1996, Applied Multivariate Techniques
  29. 10.2106/00004623-196850020-00002 · DOI
  30. 10.1097/00003086-198509000-00007 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Crocker L., 1986, Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory
  33. De Ayala RJ, 1993, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 172
  34. 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00543.x · DOI
  35. Joreskog KG, 1993, LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with SIMPLIS Command Language
  36. Linacre JM, 1998, A User's Guide to BIGSTEPS WINSTEPS. Rasch-Model Computer Program
  37. Sharma S., 1996, Applied Multivariate Techniques

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Irrgang, J. J., Anderson, A. F., Boland, A. L., Harner, C. D., Kurosaka, M., Neyret, P., Richmond, J. C., & Shelborne, K. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Methodist Sports Medicine Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2001-09
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
600-613
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2162321417
Cited by
2,204
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 156 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 165 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 76
FWCI
10.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Keywords
knee symptoms, knee function, sports activities, reliability statistics, validity, Short Form-36, factor analysis, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Knee, Knee Injuries, Medical Records, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Trauma Severity Indices, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review