A Multidisciplinary Study of the Healing of an Intraarticular Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft in a Goat Model
Abstract
We evaluated knee function, tensile properties, and histologic appearance of a healing intraarticular bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a goat model. The patellar tendon graft was fixed such that both bone-to-bone (femoral tunnel) and bone-to-tendon (tibial tunnel) healing could be studied. The total anteroposterior translation significantly increased from 3 to 6 weeks, ranging from increases of 28.8% to 46.7%. In situ forces in the replacement graft decreased as much as 22.2% at 6 weeks. Conversely, tensile properties of the femur-anterior cruciate ligament graft-tibia complex did not change significantly from 3 to 6 weeks. However, the mode of failure changed from the graft pulling out of the tibial tunnel at 3 weeks to a mix of midsubstance failures (N = 2) and pullouts (N = 5) at 6 weeks. Histologic evaluations revealed progressive and complete incorporation of the bone block in the femoral tunnel, but only partial incorporation of the tendinous part of the graft in the tibial tunnel. The differences demonstrated at 3 and 6 weeks may be a result of the remodeling process of the midsubstance of the graft as the interfaces within the osseous tunnels mature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In animal studies, the healing graft's mechanical properties, such as failure load, remain less than 50% to 60% of those of the native anterior cruciate ligament.
“Animal studies have shown that the healing graft’s mechanical properties (e.g., failure load) remain less than 50% to 60% of those of the native ACL [6–8].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 190
- Authors
- Papageorgiou, C. D., Ma, C. B., Abramowitch, S. D., Clineff, T. D., & Woo, S. L.-Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 620-626
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W1937547426
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR41820, R01AR041820)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Keywords
- anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, graft healing, goat model, graft integration, knee laxity, graft remodeling, femoral tunnel, tibial tunnel, graft fixation
- MeSH terms
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Female, Goats, Tensile Strength, Transplantation, Homologous, Wound Healing, Anterior Cruciate Ligament
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review