The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective Trial of a Treatment Algorithm for the Management of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee
Abstract
Background: Specific guidelines for operative versus nonoperative management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries do not yet exist. Hypothesis: Surgical risk factors can be used to indicate whether reconstruction or conservative management is best for an individual patient. Study Design: Prospective nonrandomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients were classified as high, moderate, or low risk using preinjury sports participation and knee laxity measurements. Early anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (within 3 months of injury) was recommended to high-risk patients and conservative care to low-risk patients. It was recommended that moderate-risk patients have either early reconstruction or conservative care, according to the day of presentation. Assessment of subjective outcomes, activity, physical measurements, and radiographs was performed at mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Results: Early phase conservative management resulted in more late phase meniscus surgery than did early phase reconstruction at all risk levels (high risk, 25% vs 6.5%; moderate risk, 37% vs 7.7%, P =. 01; low risk, 16% vs 0%). Early- and late-reconstruction patients’ Tegner scores increased from presurgery to follow-up (P <. 001) but did not return to preinjury levels. Early-reconstruction patients had higher rates of degenerative change on radiographs than did nonreconstruction patients (P <. 05). Conclusions: Early phase reconstruction reduced late phase knee laxity, risk of symptomatic instability, and the risk of late meniscus tear and surgery. Moderate- and high-risk patients had similar rates of late phase injury and surgery. Reconstruction did not prevent the appearance of late degenerative changes on radiographs. Relationship between bone contusion on initial magnetic resonance images and the finding of degenerative changes on follow-up radiographs were not detected. The treatment algorithm used in this study was effective in predicting risk of late phase knee surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Long-term Consequence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscus Injuries: Osteoarthritis
Lohmander, L. S., Englund, P. M., Dahl, L. L., & Roos, E. M. (2007) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546507307396 · Cited by 2,344
Osseous Landmarks of the Femoral Attachment of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: An Anatomic Study
Ferretti, M., Ekdahl, M., Shen, W., & Fu, F. H. (2007) · Arthroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.09.008 · Cited by 540
Jordan, S. S., DeFrate, L. E., Wook Nha, K., Papannagari, R., Gill, T. J., & Li, G. (2007) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546506295941 · Cited by 121
Hao, Z., Wang, S., Zhang, X., & Lu, J. (2016) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/cpr.12242 · Cited by 88
Abram, S. G. F., Judge, A., Khan, T., Beard, D. J., & Price, A. J. (2019) · Acta Orthopaedica · doi:10.1080/17453674.2019.1639360 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Fithian, D. C., Paxton, E. W., Stone, M. L., Luetzow, W. F., Csintalan, R. P., Phelan, D., & Daniel, D. M.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 335-346
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2075623344
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Trial of a Treatment Algorithm for the Management of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546504269590
- The paper
- Fithian, D. C., Paxton, E. W., Stone, M. L., Luetzow, W. F., Csintalan, R. P., Phelan, D., & Daniel, D. M. (2005). Prospective Trial of a Treatment Algorithm for the Management of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504269590
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.