Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prospective Trial of a Treatment Algorithm for the Management of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee

Fithian, Donald C., Paxton, Elizabeth W., Stone, Mary Lou, Luetzow, William F., Csintalan, Rick P., Phelan, Daniel, Daniel, Dale M.·2005·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: Specific guidelines for operative versus nonoperative management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries do not yet exist. Hypothesis: Surgical risk factors can be used to indicate whether reconstruction or conservative management is best for an individual patient. Study Design: Prospective nonrandomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients were classified as high, moderate, or low risk using preinjury sports participation and knee laxity measurements. Early anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (within 3 months of injury) was recommended to high-risk patients and conservative care to low-risk patients. It was recommended that moderate-risk patients have either early reconstruction or conservative care, according to the day of presentation. Assessment of subjective outcomes, activity, physical measurements, and radiographs was performed at mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Results: Early phase conservative management resulted in more late phase meniscus surgery than did early phase reconstruction at all risk levels (high risk, 25% vs 6.5%; moderate risk, 37% vs 7.7%, P =. 01; low risk, 16% vs 0%). Early- and late-reconstruction patients’ Tegner scores increased from presurgery to follow-up (P <. 001) but did not return to preinjury levels. Early-reconstruction patients had higher rates of degenerative change on radiographs than did nonreconstruction patients (P <. 05). Conclusions: Early phase reconstruction reduced late phase knee laxity, risk of symptomatic instability, and the risk of late meniscus tear and surgery. Moderate- and high-risk patients had similar rates of late phase injury and surgery. Reconstruction did not prevent the appearance of late degenerative changes on radiographs. Relationship between bone contusion on initial magnetic resonance images and the finding of degenerative changes on follow-up radiographs were not detected. The treatment algorithm used in this study was effective in predicting risk of late phase knee surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546504269590

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
Fithian, D. C., Paxton, E. W., Stone, M. L., Luetzow, W. F., Csintalan, R. P., Phelan, D., & Daniel, D. M.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2005-03
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
335-346
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2075623344
Cited by
380
References
0
FWCI
17.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Trial of a Treatment Algorithm for the Management of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546504269590
The paper
Fithian, D. C., Paxton, E. W., Stone, M. L., Luetzow, W. F., Csintalan, R. P., Phelan, D., & Daniel, D. M. (2005). Prospective Trial of a Treatment Algorithm for the Management of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504269590

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.