The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Autograft Choice: Bone-Tendon-Bone versus Hamstring: Does It Really Matter? A Systematic Review
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament graft choice is controversial, with no evidence-based consensus available to guide decision making. The study design was evidence-based medicine systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts. A literature review identified 9 randomized controlled trials comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. An evidence-based systematic review was performed. Objective and subjective outcomes of interest included surgical technique, rehabilitation, instrumented laxity, isokinetic strength, patellofemoral pain, return to preinjury activity, and Tegner, Lysholm, Cincinnati, and International Knee Documentation Committee–1991 scores. Additional surgery, graft failure, and complications were reviewed. Slight increased laxity on arthrometer testing was seen in the hamstring population in 3 of 7 studies. Pain with kneeling was greater for the patellar tendon population in 4 of 4 studies. Only 1 of 9 studies showed increased anterior knee pain in the patellar tendon group. Frequency of additional surgery seemed to be related to the fixation method and not graft type. No study reported a significant difference in graft failure between patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Objective differences (range of motion, isokinetic strength, arthrometer testing) were not detected between groups in the majority of studies, suggesting that their sensitivity to detect clinical outcomes may be limited. Increased kneeling pain in the patellar tendon group was seen consistently in the studies evaluated. Subjective differences in anterior knee pain or return-to-activity level were not consistently observed in these studies. With numbers available, failure rates were not significantly different between groups. These findings suggest that graft type may not be the primary determinant for successful outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Cited by
Renstrom, P., Ljungqvist, A., Arendt, E., Beynnon, B., Fukubayashi, T., Garrett, W., Georgoulis, T., Hewett, T. E., Johnson, R., Krosshaug, T., et al. (2008) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.048934 · Cited by 820
Kaeding, C. C., Pedroza, A. D., Reinke, E. K., Huston, L. J., MOON Consortium, Spindler, K. P., Amendola, A., Andrish, J. T., Brophy, R. H., Dunn, W. R., et al. (2015) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546515578836 · Cited by 628
Self-citation“Biological failure” of the anterior cruciate ligament graft
Ménétrey, J., Duthon, V. B., Laumonier, T., & Fritschy, D. (2008) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-007-0474-x · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Spindler, K. P., Kuhn, J. E., Freedman, K. B., Matthews, C. E., Dittus, R. S., & Harrell, F. E.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1986-1995
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2072916459
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Autograft Choice: Bone-Tendon-Bone versus Hamstring: Does It Really Matter? A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546504271211
- The paper
- Spindler, K. P., Kuhn, J. E., Freedman, K. B., Matthews, C. E., Dittus, R. S., & Harrell, F. E. (2004). Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Autograft Choice: Bone-Tendon-Bone versus Hamstring: Does It Really Matter? A Systematic Review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504271211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.