The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development of a National Cruciate Ligament Surgery Registry: The Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry
Abstract
Background: No prospective surveillance system exists for monitoring the outcome of cruciate ligament surgery. Purpose: This article is intended to describe the development and procedures of the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry (NKLR), including baseline results from the first 2 years of operation. Study Design: Cohort study (prevalence); Level of evidence, 1. Methods: The NKLR was established on June 7, 2004 to collect information prospectively on all cases of cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery in Norway. Information on the details of surgery is gathered through a registration form completed by the surgeon postoperatively, and a validated knee outcome score form is completed by the patients preoperatively and at follow-ups on all patients at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. Hospital compliance was examined in 2005 and 2006. Results: A total of 2793 primary cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries were registered by 57 hospitals. This corresponds to an annual population incidence of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries of 34 per 100 000 citizens (85 per 100 000 citizens in the main at-risk age group of 16–39 years). After 21 months of operation, the NKLR had an overall compliance of 97% when compared with the hospital records. Conclusions: A national population-based cruciate ligament registry has been developed, implemented, and maintained in Norway. The registry will each year enroll approximately 1500 primary cruciate ligament reconstruction cases. It is expected that inadequate procedures and devices can be identified, as well as prognostic factors associated with good and poor outcomes, at least for the most frequent categories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Renstrom, P., Ljungqvist, A., Arendt, E., Beynnon, B., Fukubayashi, T., Garrett, W., Georgoulis, T., Hewett, T. E., Johnson, R., Krosshaug, T., et al. (2008) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.048934 · Cited by 820
Self-citationLynch, A. D., Logerstedt, D. S., Grindem, H., Eitzen, I., Hicks, G. E., Axe, M. J., Engebretsen, L., Risberg, M. A., & Snyder-Mackler, L. (2015) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092299 · Cited by 348
Self-citationTan, S. H. S., Lau, B. P. H., Khin, L. W., & Lingaraj, K. (2016) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546515573008 · Cited by 190
Gamada, K. (2014) · International Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.4172/2329-9096.1000246 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Granan, L.-P., Bahr, R., Steindal, K., Furnes, O., & Engebretsen, L.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-11-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 308-315
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2072398105
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.