The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Return to High School– and College-Level Football After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study
Open accessAbstract
Background: There is a relative paucity of data regarding the effect of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on the ability of American high school and collegiate football players to return to play at the same level of competition as before their injury or to progress to play at the next level of competition. Purpose: (1) To identify the percentage of high school and collegiate American football players who successfully returned to play at their previous level of competition, (2) to investigate self-reported performance for those players able to return to play or reason(s) for not returning to play, and (3) to elucidate risk factors responsible for players not being able to return to play or not returning to the same level of performance. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospective patients taken from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort who identified football as their primary or secondary sport. Identified patients were then questioned in a structured interview regarding their ACL injury, participation in football before their injury, and factors associated with returning to play. Data were analyzed for player position, concurrent meniscal/ligamentous/chondral injury, surgical technique and graft used for ACL reconstruction, and issues pertaining to timing and ability to return to play. Results: One hundred forty-seven players (including 68 high school and 26 collegiate) met our criteria and were contacted from the 2002 and 2003 MOON cohorts. Return to play rates for all high school and collegiate athletes were similar (63% and 69%, respectively). Based on player perception, 43% of the players were able to return to play at the same self-described performance level. Approximately 27% felt they did not perform at a level attained before their ACL tear, and 30% were unable to return to play at all. Although two thirds of players reported some “other interest” contributing to their decision not to return, at both levels of competition, fear of reinjury or further damage was cited by approximately 50% of the players who did not return to play. Analysis of patient-reported outcome scores at a minimum of 2 years after surgery between patients who returned to play and those who did not demonstrated clinically and statistically significant differences in the International Knee Documentation Committee form, Marx Activity Scale, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score knee-related quality of life subscale in the collegiate players. Similar clinical differences were not statistically significant in the high school students. Player position did not have a statistically significant effect on the ability to return to play for high school players, and 41% of “skilled” position players and 50% of “nonskilled” position players were able to return to play at the same performance level. Conclusion: Return to play percentages for amateur American football players after ACL reconstruction are not as high as would be expected. While technical aspects of ACL reconstruction and the ensuing rehabilitation have been studied extensively, the psychological factors (primarily a fear of reinjury) influencing the ability to return to play after ACL surgery may be underestimated as a critical factor responsible for athletes not returning to play at any level of competition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ardern, C. L., Taylor, N. F., Feller, J. A., & Webster, K. E. (2014) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-093398 · Cited by 1,465
van Melick, N., van Cingel, R. E. H., Brooijmans, F., Neeter, C., van Tienen, T., Hullegie, W., & Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095898 · Cited by 918
Ardern, C. L., Taylor, N. F., Feller, J. A., Whitehead, T. S., & Webster, K. E. (2013) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546513489284 · Cited by 660
Sonnery-Cottet, B., Saithna, A., Cavalier, M., Kajetanek, C., Temponi, E. F., Daggett, M., Helito, C. P., & Thaunat, M. (2017) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546516686057 · Cited by 528
Ardern, C. L., Österberg, A., Tagesson, S., Gauffin, H., Webster, K. E., & Kvist, J. (2014) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-093842 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- McCullough, K. A., Phelps, K. D., Spindler, K. P., Matava, M. J., Dunn, W. R., Parker, R. D., MOON Group, Reinke, E. K., Amendola, A., Andrish, J. T., Kaeding, C. C., Marx, R. G., McCarty, E. C., & Wright, R. W.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-08-24
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2523-2529
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2128210950
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Return to High School– and College-Level Football After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546512456836
- The paper
- McCullough, K. A., Phelps, K. D., Spindler, K. P., Matava, M. J., Dunn, W. R., Parker, R. D., MOON Group, Reinke, E. K., Amendola, A., Andrish, J. T., Kaeding, C. C., Marx, R. G., McCarty, E. C., & Wright, R. W. (2012). Return to High School– and College-Level Football After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512456836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.