The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Return to Play and Future ACL Injury Risk After ACL Reconstruction in Soccer Athletes From the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Group
Open accessAbstract
Background: There is limited information on outcomes and return to play (RTP) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in soccer athletes. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to (1) test the hypotheses that player sex, side of injury, and graft choice do not influence RTP and (2) define the risk for future ACL injury in soccer players after ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Soccer players in a prospective cohort were contacted to determine RTP after ACLR. Information regarding if and when they returned to play, their current playing status, the primary reason they stopped playing soccer (if relevant), and incidence of subsequent ACL surgery was recorded. Results: Initially, 72% of 100 soccer athletes (55 male, 45 female) with a mean age of 24.2 years at the time of ACLR returned to soccer. At average follow-up of 7.0 years, 36% were still playing, a significant decrease compared with initial RTP ( P < .0001). Based on multivariate analysis, older athletes ( P = .006) and females ( P = .037) were less likely to return to play. Twelve soccer athletes had undergone further ACL surgery, including 9 on the contralateral knee and 3 on the ipsilateral knee. In a univariate analysis, females were more likely to have future ACL surgery (20% vs 5.5%, P = .03). Soccer athletes who underwent ACLR on their nondominant limb had a higher future rate of contralateral ACLR (16%) than soccer athletes who underwent ACLR on their dominant limb (3.5%) ( P = .03). Conclusion: Younger and male soccer players are more likely to return to play after ACL reconstruction. Return to soccer after ACLR declines over time. ACLR on the nondominant limb potentially places the dominant limb at risk for future ACL injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ardern, C. L., Taylor, N. F., Feller, J. A., & Webster, K. E. (2014) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-093398 · Cited by 1,465
van Melick, N., van Cingel, R. E. H., Brooijmans, F., Neeter, C., van Tienen, T., Hullegie, W., & Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095898 · Cited by 918
Sonnery-Cottet, B., Saithna, A., Cavalier, M., Kajetanek, C., Temponi, E. F., Daggett, M., Helito, C. P., & Thaunat, M. (2017) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546516686057 · Cited by 528
Ardern, C. L., Österberg, A., Tagesson, S., Gauffin, H., Webster, K. E., & Kvist, J. (2014) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-093842 · Cited by 489
Czuppon, S., Racette, B. A., Klein, S. E., & Harris-Hayes, M. (2014) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091786 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Brophy, R. H., Schmitz, L., Wright, R. W., Dunn, W. R., Parker, R. D., Andrish, J. T., McCarty, E. C., & Spindler, K. P.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-09-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2517-2522
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2128527050
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Return to Play and Future ACL Injury Risk After ACL Reconstruction in Soccer Athletes From the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546512459476
- The paper
- Brophy, R. H., Schmitz, L., Wright, R. W., Dunn, W. R., Parker, R. D., Andrish, J. T., McCarty, E. C., & Spindler, K. P. (2012). Return to Play and Future ACL Injury Risk After ACL Reconstruction in Soccer Athletes From the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Group. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512459476
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.