The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical Outcomes of Knee Osteoarthritis Treated With an Autologous Protein Solution Injection: A 1-Year Pilot Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating disease resulting in substantial pain and functional limitations. A novel blood derivative has been developed to concentrate both growth factors and antagonists of inflammatory cytokines, with promising preliminary findings in terms of safety profile and clinical improvement. Purpose: To investigate if one intra-articular injection of autologous protein solution (APS) can reduce pain and improve function in patients affected by knee OA in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, saline-controlled study. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Forty-six patients with unilateral knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence 2 or 3) were randomized into the APS group (n = 31), which received a single ultrasound-guided injection of APS, and the saline (control) group (n = 15), which received a single saline injection. Patient-reported outcomes and adverse events were collected at 2 weeks and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months through visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Short Form–36 (SF-36), Clinical Global Impression of Severity/Change (CGI-S/C), Patient Global Impression of Severity/Change (PGI-S/C), and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology–Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) responder rate. Imaging evaluation was also performed with radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after treatment (12 months and 3 and 12 months, respectively). Results: The safety profile was positive, with no significant differences in frequency and severity of adverse events between groups. The improvement from baseline to 2 weeks and to 1, 3, and 6 months was similar between treatments. At 12 months, improvement in WOMAC pain score was 65% in the APS group and 41% in the saline group ( P = .02). There were no significant differences in VAS pain improvement between groups. At 12 months, APS group showed improved SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale ( P = .0085) and Role Emotional Health subscale ( P = .0410), as well as CGI-C values ( P = .01) compared with saline control. Significant differences between groups were detected in change from baseline to 12 months in bone marrow lesion size as assessed on MRI and osteophytes in the central zone of the lateral femoral condyle, both in favor of the APS group ( P = .041 and P = .032, respectively). There were no significant differences between APS and control groups in other measured secondary endpoints. Conclusion: This study provides evidence to support the safety and clinical improvement at 1-year follow-up of a single intra-articular injection of APS in patients affected by knee OA. Treatment with APS or a saline injection provided significant pain relief over the course of the study with differences becoming apparent at between 6 and 12 months after treatment. Trial Registration: NCT02138890 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biomimetics are still in the experimental stages.
“Despite promising results, biomimetics are still in the experimental stages, and more extensive clinical trials are necessary to verify their long-term effectiveness and safety [33].”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1016/j.joca.2011.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-014-3113-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.joca.2008.06.014 · DOI
- 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000160 · DOI
- 10.2460/ajvr.75.2.141 · DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.M.00726 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546516665809 · DOI
- Creamer P, 1999, Rheumatology, 26, 1785
- 10.1186/s40634-016-0060-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/acr.22897 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546515582027 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-015-3778-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-016-4089-y · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-013-2743-1 · DOI
- 10.22203/eCM.v021a16 · DOI
- 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31827c3846 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-011-1818-0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00321.x · DOI
- 10.1186/s40634-016-0043-7 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-0034-1390028 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546516634674 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11926-013-0323-5 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0156137 · DOI
- 10.1002/jor.22464 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00011-003-1197-1 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0028663 · DOI
- 10.1002/jor.22671 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00011-011-0353-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.joca.2004.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546514524710 · DOI
- 10.1186/ar3050 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546515624678 · DOI
- 10.1111/vsu.12512 · DOI
- 10.1002/jor.21384 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.joca.2007.07.008 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Autologous Protein Solution Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: 3-Year Results
Kon, E., Engebretsen, L., Verdonk, P., Nehrer, S., & Filardo, G. (2020) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546520944891 · Cited by 48
Self-citationGoulian, A. J., Goldstein, B., & Saad, M. A. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14062061 · Cited by 25
“Despite promising results, biomimetics are still in the experimental stages, and more extensive clinical trials are necessary to verify their long-term effectiveness and safety [33].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Kon, E., Engebretsen, L., Verdonk, P., Nehrer, S., & Filardo, G.
- Affiliations
- Humanitas University (IT)
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
- Dekan Fakultät Gesundheit und Medizin, Leiter Department für Gesundheitswissenschaften und Biomedizin, Leiter Zentrum für Regenerative Medizin und Orthopädie, Krems, Austria
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Filardo, Giuseppe
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-10-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 171-180
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2762388942
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Keywords
- knee osteoarthritis, autologous protein solution, intra-articular injection, ultrasound-guided injection, growth factors, analgesia, functional outcome, WOMAC, KOOS, SF-36, treatment safety, cartilage repair, cartilage degeneration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Injections, Intra-Articular, Knee Joint, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Proteins, Cytokines, Treatment Outcome, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Pain Management, Visual Analog Scale
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review