Cited by 98Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsTendon Structure and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical Outcomes of Knee Osteoarthritis Treated With an Autologous Protein Solution Injection: A 1-Year Pilot Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Kon, Elizaveta, Engebretsen, Lars, Verdonk, Peter, Nehrer, Stefan, Filardo, Giuseppe·2018·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating disease resulting in substantial pain and functional limitations. A novel blood derivative has been developed to concentrate both growth factors and antagonists of inflammatory cytokines, with promising preliminary findings in terms of safety profile and clinical improvement. Purpose: To investigate if one intra-articular injection of autologous protein solution (APS) can reduce pain and improve function in patients affected by knee OA in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, saline-controlled study. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Forty-six patients with unilateral knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence 2 or 3) were randomized into the APS group (n = 31), which received a single ultrasound-guided injection of APS, and the saline (control) group (n = 15), which received a single saline injection. Patient-reported outcomes and adverse events were collected at 2 weeks and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months through visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Short Form–36 (SF-36), Clinical Global Impression of Severity/Change (CGI-S/C), Patient Global Impression of Severity/Change (PGI-S/C), and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology–Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) responder rate. Imaging evaluation was also performed with radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after treatment (12 months and 3 and 12 months, respectively). Results: The safety profile was positive, with no significant differences in frequency and severity of adverse events between groups. The improvement from baseline to 2 weeks and to 1, 3, and 6 months was similar between treatments. At 12 months, improvement in WOMAC pain score was 65% in the APS group and 41% in the saline group ( P = .02). There were no significant differences in VAS pain improvement between groups. At 12 months, APS group showed improved SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale ( P = .0085) and Role Emotional Health subscale ( P = .0410), as well as CGI-C values ( P = .01) compared with saline control. Significant differences between groups were detected in change from baseline to 12 months in bone marrow lesion size as assessed on MRI and osteophytes in the central zone of the lateral femoral condyle, both in favor of the APS group ( P = .041 and P = .032, respectively). There were no significant differences between APS and control groups in other measured secondary endpoints. Conclusion: This study provides evidence to support the safety and clinical improvement at 1-year follow-up of a single intra-articular injection of APS in patients affected by knee OA. Treatment with APS or a saline injection provided significant pain relief over the course of the study with differences becoming apparent at between 6 and 12 months after treatment. Trial Registration: NCT02138890 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546517732734

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1016/j.joca.2011.10.010 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s00167-014-3113-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.joca.2008.06.014 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000160 · DOI
  5. 10.2460/ajvr.75.2.141 · DOI
  6. 10.2106/JBJS.M.00726 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/0363546516665809 · DOI
  8. Creamer P, 1999, Rheumatology, 26, 1785
  9. 10.1186/s40634-016-0060-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/acr.22897 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0363546515582027 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s00167-015-3778-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s00167-016-4089-y · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s00167-013-2743-1 · DOI
  15. 10.22203/eCM.v021a16 · DOI
  16. 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31827c3846 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s00167-011-1818-0 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00321.x · DOI
  19. 10.1186/s40634-016-0043-7 · DOI
  20. 10.1055/s-0034-1390028 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/0363546516634674 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11926-013-0323-5 · DOI
  23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0156137 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/jor.22464 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s00011-003-1197-1 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028663 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/jor.22671 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s00011-011-0353-2 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.joca.2004.02.001 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0363546514524710 · DOI
  31. 10.1186/ar3050 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/0363546515624678 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/vsu.12512 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/jor.21384 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.07.008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kon, E., Engebretsen, L., Verdonk, P., Nehrer, S., & Filardo, G.
Affiliations
  • Humanitas University (IT)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
  • Dekan Fakultät Gesundheit und Medizin, Leiter Department für Gesundheitswissenschaften und Biomedizin, Leiter Zentrum für Regenerative Medizin und Orthopädie, Krems, Austria
  • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT)
Corresponding author
Filardo, Giuseppe
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2017-10-10
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
171-180
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2762388942
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
Keywords
knee osteoarthritis, autologous protein solution, intra-articular injection, ultrasound-guided injection, growth factors, analgesia, functional outcome, WOMAC, KOOS, SF-36, treatment safety, cartilage repair, cartilage degeneration
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Injections, Intra-Articular, Knee Joint, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Proteins, Cytokines, Treatment Outcome, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Pain Management, Visual Analog Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review