The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: Defining a rationale for augmentation
Abstract
Fifty primary ACL repairs using the Marshall multiple suture technique were analyzed. The average age at surgery was 23 years (range, 15 to 56), with 76% under the age of 30. The average followup was 61.3 months (range, 48 to 86). The average time from injury to surgery was 7 days (range, 1 to 18). Eighty percent of the injuries were sports-related with football and skiing predominating. Thirty-eight percent were "isolated" ACL tears, and 62% had associated injuries. There was a 46% incidence of meniscal tear with 59% of the meniscal tears being repaired. The postoperative evaluation included a multifactorial analysis correlating 43 variables including subjective, objective, radiographic, and KT-1000 data. The Hospi tal for Special Surgery Knee Diagnostic Score, a clinical objective score based on the postoperative Lachman and pivot shift examination, a KT-1000 arthrometer data score, and an overall combined assessment score were determined. The results showed 59% excellent, 18% good, 14% fair, and 8% poor. The Lachman test was diagnostic in all cases. The quality of ACL tissue at repair was rated excellent or good in 62% of the cases. Four patterns of ACL tears were distinguished by the location of the tear. Football injury, younger age, increased preoperative pivot shift, midsubstance Type IV tear, and return of full motion correlated with poor postoperative results. Increasing age, tight jointedness, Type I tears, and a 5° flexion contracture correlated with good postoperative results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Injuries to Knee Ligaments: Relationship to Looseness and Tightness in Football Players
Nicholas, J. A. (1970) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1970.03170260032007 · Cited by 239
Cited by
Histological Changes in the Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament After Rupture*
MURRAY, M. M., MARTIN, S. D., MARTIN, T. L., & SPECTOR, M. (2000) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200010000-00004 · Cited by 398
Murray, M. M., Spindler, K. P., Abreu, E., Muller, J. A., Nedder, A., Kelly, M., Frino, J., Zurakowski, D., Valenza, M., Snyder, B. D., et al. (2007) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.20282 · Cited by 321
Stem Cell Treatment for Ligament Repair and Reconstruction
Hevesi, M., LaPrade, M., Saris, D. B. F., & Krych, A. J. (2019) · Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12178-019-09580-4 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Sherman, M. F., Lieber, L., Bonamo, J. R., Podesta, L., & Reiter, I.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 243-255
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2081944943
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: Defining a rationale for augmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/036354659101900307
- The paper
- Sherman, M. F., Lieber, L., Bonamo, J. R., Podesta, L., & Reiter, I. (1991). The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: Defining a rationale for augmentation. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659101900307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.