The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons
Abstract
Eighty consecutive patients with chronic laxity due to a torn ACL underwent arthroscopically assisted recon struction with either autogenous patellar tendon or doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Recon structions were performed on a one-to-one alternating basis. Preoperatively, no significant differences be tween the two groups were noted with respect to age, sex, level of activity, and degree of laxity (chi square analysis). A standard rehabilitation regimen was used for all patients after surgery including immediate pas sive knee extension, early stationary cycling, protected weightbearing for 6 weeks, avoidance of resisted ter minal knee extension until 6 months, and return to activity at 10 to 12 months postoperatively. Seventy-two patients were evaluated at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively (range, 24 to 40 months). No significant differences were noted between groups with respect to subjective complaints, functional level, or objective laxity evaluation, including KT-1000 meas urements. Seventeen of 72 patients (24%) experienced anterior knee pain after ACL reconstruction. Overall, 46 of 72 patients (64%) returned to their preinjury level of activity. Mean KT-1000 scores were 1.6 ± 1.4 mm for the patellar tendon group and 1.9 ± 1.3 mm for the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons group. This study did find a statistically significant weakness in peak hamstrings torque at 60 deg/sec when recon struction was performed with double-looped semiten dinosus and gracilis tendons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aglietti, P., Buzzi, R., Zaccherotti, G., & De Biase, P. (1994) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/036354659402200210 · Cited by 503
Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Corry, I. S., Webb, J. M., Clingeleffer, A. J., & Pinczewski, L. A. (1999) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465990270040701 · Cited by 462
Xie, X., Liu, X., Chen, Z., Yu, Y., Peng, S., & Li, Q. (2015) · The Knee · doi:10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.014 · Cited by 375
Hao, Z., Wang, S., Zhang, X., & Lu, J. (2016) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/cpr.12242 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Marder, R. A., Raskind, J. R., & Carroll, M.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 478-484
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2004747623
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/036354659101900510
- The paper
- Marder, R. A., Raskind, J. R., & Carroll, M. (1991). Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659101900510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.