Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Manual Muscle Examination for Rotator Cuff Strength: An Electromyographic Investigation

Kelly, Bryan T., Kadrmas, Warren R., Speer, Kevin P.·1996·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The electromyographic activity of eight muscles of the rotator cuff and shoulder girdle (supraspinatus, in fraspinatus, subscapularis, pectoralis, latissimus dorsi, and the anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid) was measured from the nondominant shoulders of 11 sub jects during a series of 29 isometric contractions. The contractions simulated different positions used for strength testing of the rotator cuff and involved eleva tion, external rotation, and internal rotation at three degrees of initial humeral rotation (-45° of internal rotation, 0°, +45° of external rotation) and scapular elevation (0°, 45°, 90°). Isolation of the supraspinatus muscle was best achieved with the test position of elevation at 90° of scapular elevation and +45° (exter nal rotation) of humeral rotation. Isolation of the in fraspinatus muscle was best achieved with external rotation at 0° of scapular elevation and -45° (internal rotation) of humeral rotation. Isolation of the subscap ularis muscle was best achieved with the Gerber push- off test. This study used four criteria for identifying the optimal manual muscle test for each rotator cuff mus cle : 1) maximal activation of the cuff muscle, 2) minimal contribution from involved shoulder synergists, 3) min imal provocation of pain, and 4) good test-retest reli ability. Based on the results of this study and known painful arcs of motion, an objective identification of the optimal tests for the manual muscle testing of the cuff was elucidated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/036354659602400504

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kelly, B. T., Kadrmas, W. R., & Speer, K. P.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
1996-09
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
581-588
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2033104850
Cited by
286
References
0
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.