The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Feminist Outlooks on Intersectionality
Abstract
With its recognition of the combined effects of the social categories of race, class and gender intersectionality has risen to the rank of feminism's most important contribution to date. Though the first intersectional research (American and British) gave visibility to the social locus of women who self-identified as “black” or “of colour”, current research goes beyond the confines of the English-speaking world and aims increasingly to develop an intersectional instrument to deal with discrimination. This project gives rise to two kinds of debate: one related to producing intersectional information and to ways of carrying out research in this area, the other to do with the use of this information in the political struggle for equality. The current paper, which is confined to the first debate, attempts to bring out the main tension points in present theorizations of intersectionality. Its objective is twofold: to demonstrate certain limits to the explanatory power of intersectionality, and to suggest ways forward in the light of discussions already in train. In order to do so four points are tackled: intersectionality as a research paradigm, the issue of levels of analysis, the theoretical difference of opinion on the ontological status of categories of difference and the issue of widening the theoretical scope of intersectionality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
The Complexity of Intersectionality
McCall, L. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/426800 · Cited by 6,682 · cited 1×
“More recently, intersectionality has seen itself raised to the status of being the most important theoretical contribution to date of feminism (McCall, 2005: 1771), on the basis of its promising attempt to deal with the differences and complexities arising out of the generation of theory as well as…”
BackgroundDavis, K. (2008) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700108086364 · Cited by 2,539
Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity
Hall, S. (1986) · Journal of Communication Inquiry · doi:10.1177/019685998601000202 · Cited by 1,617
Complexity Theory, Systems Theory, and Multiple Intersecting Social Inequalities
Walby, S. (2007) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393107307663 · Cited by 564
Cited by
The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory
Carastathis, A. (2014) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12129 · Cited by 666
The Difference That Power Makes: Intersectionality and Participatory Democracy
Hill Collins, P. (2017) · Investigaciones Feministas · doi:10.5209/infe.54888 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Bilge, S.
- Venue
- Diogenes
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-72
- ISSN
- 0392-1921 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7695
- OpenAlex
- W2061768702
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Feminist Outlooks on Intersectionality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0392192110374245
- The paper
- Bilge, S. (2010). Recent Feminist Outlooks on Intersectionality. Diogenes. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192110374245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.