Cited by 11Mental Health Treatment and AccessSex and Gender in HealthcareGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Is the Statistical Association between Sex and the Use of Services for Mental Health Reasons Confounded or Modified by Social Anchorage?

Drapeau, Aline, Lesage, Alain, Boyer, Richard·2005·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Confounding and interaction have differing implications for the interpretation of findings and the design of research, mental health services, and policy. This study aimed to verify whether the association between sex and the use of services for mental health reasons is confounded or modified by social anchorage. Methods We undertook a case-control study nested in Cycle 1.2 of the Canadian Community Health Survey. Cases were defined as users of general medical services for mental health reasons in the previous 12 months, and control subjects were defined as never-users of any services for mental health reasons. The pattern of social anchorage was described by the roles of parent, spouse, worker, and their combination. Results Overall, women are 2.9 times more likely than men to use general services for mental health reasons. However, this inequality between women and men decreases substantially or subsides in individuals who are less anchored to Canadian society. For instance, in single parents and in unemployed parents, the odds of using general services for mental health reasons are similar in women and in men. The pattern of social anchorage tends to modify, but not to confound, the association between sex and the use of services. Conclusions Ignoring the interaction between sex and the pattern of social anchorage distorts the interpretation of the inequality between women and men in the use of general medical services for mental health reasons and may affect the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/070674370505001005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 11

Authors
Drapeau, A., Lesage, A., & Boyer, R.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Drapeau, Aline
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2005-09
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
599-604
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2146472322
Cited by
11
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
sex differences, mental health service utilization, confounding, interaction, gender inequality, single parents, unemployed parents, mental health services, mental health policy, Canadian Community Health Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Canada, Community Mental Health Services, Demography, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychology, Social Support, Single Parent, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review