Combined therapy of major depression with concomitant borderline personality disorder: comparison of interpersonal and cognitive psychotherapy
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The combination of antidepressants and brief psychotherapies has been proven more efficacious in treating major depression and is particularly recommended in patients with concomitant personality disorders. We compare the effects of 2 combined therapies, fluoxetine and interpersonal therapy (IPT) or fluoxetine and cognitive therapy (CT), on major depression in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Method: Thirty-five consecutive outpatients with a diagnosis of BPD and a major depressive episode (not bipolar and not psychotic) were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 combined treatments and treated for 24 weeks. Assessment included a semistructured interview, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Satisfaction Profile (SAT-P) for quality of life (QOL), and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-64). Statistical analysis was performed using the univariate General Linear Model to calculate the effects of duration and type of treatment. Results: No significant differences between treatments were found at CGI, HDRS, BDI-II, and SOFAS score. Combined treatment with CT had greater effects on HARS score and on psychological functioning factor of SAT-P. Combined treatment with IPT was more effective on social functioning factor of SAT-P and on domains domineering or controlling and intrusive or needy of IIP-64. Conclusions: Both combined therapies are efficacious in treating major depression in patients with BPD. Differences between CT and IPT concern specific features of subjective QOL and interpersonal problems. These findings lack reliable comparisons and need to be replicated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to IPT, CT showed better results for anxiety (moderate effect) and mental health status (small effect).
“As compared to IPT, better results were found for CT for the outcomes anxiety (moderate effect) and mental health status (small effect).”
From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bellino 2007
For depression, the difference between CT and IPT was marginal in size.
“For the outcome of depression, the difference was marginal in size.”
From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bellino 2007
Cognitive Therapy (CT) compared with CCT and IPT yielded no statistically significant differences for any outcome.
“Both comparisons yielded no statistically significant differences for any outcome.”
From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bellino 2007
In the IPT-BPD trial (Bellino 2010), allegiance effect was improbable at low risk because the working group seemed experienced in but not associated with IPT.
“Allegiance effect improbable? Low risk The working group seems to be experienced in but not to be associated with IPT (cf. Bellino 2006;Bellino 2007).”
From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bellino 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Bellino, S., Zizza, M., Rinaldi, C., & Bogetto, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Turin (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Bellino, Silvio
- ORCID
- Bellino, Silvio
- Venue
- The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 718-725
- ISSN
- 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
- 1497-0015
- OpenAlex
- W67379038
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, borderline personality disorder, combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, cognitive therapy, fluoxetine, quality of life, social functioning, interpersonal problems, anxiety symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety Disorders, Borderline Personality Disorder, Combined Modality Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Fluoxetine, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review