Cyberbullying in Children and Youth: Implications for Health and Clinical Practice
Open accessAbstract
We review the recent literature on cyberbullying and its effects on victimised youth, identifying key points. We conclude that cyberbullying, while following many of the underlying dynamics of more traditional forms of bullying, features some unique qualities that can both magnify the damage caused and make it more difficult to detect. These features include the pervasive, never-ending nature of cyberbullying and the ability to quickly reach large audiences. The potential for anonymity and the related distance afforded by screens and devices compared to in-person interaction allow the cruelty of cyberbullying to go unchecked. Despite the perceived anonymity of cyberbullying, cyberbullying can be perpetrated by friends, who often have intimate knowledge about the victimised youth that can be devastating when made public. Given the difficulty schools face in preventing or even detecting cyberbullying, health care providers are an important ally, due to their knowledge of the youth, the sense of trust they bring to youth, and their independence from the school setting. We conclude by calling for routine screening of bullying by health care providers who deal with paediatric populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increased use of MTSDs has raised concerns among parents, researchers and educators about potential negative impact on adolescents' mental, social and physical well-being and development.
“However, this increased use has also raised concerns among parents, researchers and educators about its potential negative impact on adolescents’ mental, social and physical well-being and development, such as depression [11], adverse family relationships [12], cyberbullying [13], poor sleep quality [14, 15], sedentariness [16], musculoskeletal symptoms [17, 18] and visual symptoms [18].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- Vaillancourt, T., Faris, R., & Mishna, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Vaillancourt, Tracy
- Venue
- The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-12-19
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 368-373
- ISSN
- 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
- 1497-0015
- PMC
- PMC5455867
- OpenAlex
- W2579569167
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Keywords
- cyberbullying, children, youth, bullying victimization, anonymity, school bullying prevention, health care provider role, pediatric patients
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child Health Services, Humans, Adolescent Health Services, Crime Victims, Internet, Bullying
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review