Cited by 89Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurological disorders and treatmentsRestless Legs Syndrome Research

The Assessment and Treatment of Antipsychotic-Induced Akathisia

Open access
Pringsheim, Tamara, Gardner, David, Addington, Donald, Martino, Davide, Morgante, Francesca, Ricciardi, Lucia, Poole, Norman, Remington, Gary +3 more·2018·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Akathisia is a common and distressing neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with antipsychotic medication, characterised by subjective and objective psychomotor restlessness. The goal of this guideline is to provide clinicians with recommendations on the assessment and treatment of akathisia. Methods: We performed a systematic review of therapeutic studies assessing the treatment of antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms. Forty studies on akathisia and 4 systematic reviews evaluating the adverse effects of antipsychotics were used in the formulation of recommendations. Studies were rated for methodological quality using the American Academy of Neurology Risk of Bias Classification system. The overall level of evidence classifications and grades of recommendation were made using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network framework. Results: As a good practice point, clinicians should systematically assess akathisia with a validated scale before starting antipsychotics and during antipsychotic dosage titration. For the management of akathisia, there was adequate evidence to allow recommendations regarding antipsychotic dose reduction, antipsychotic polypharmacy, switching antipsychotic medication, and the use of adjuvant medications including beta-blockers, anticholinergics, 5HT 2A antagonists, benzodiazepines, and vitamin B6. Conclusion: The treatment of antipsychotic-induced akathisia should be personalised, with consideration of antipsychotic dose reduction, cessation of antipsychotic polypharmacy, and switching to an antipsychotic with a perceived lower liability for akathisia, before the use of adjuvant medications. The choice of adjuvant medications should favour the more established treatments, with careful consideration of contraindications and side effects. Limitations in the evidence should be acknowledged and prompt cautious prescribing, particularly with respect to the duration of use of adjuvant medications, is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0706743718760288

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primary clinical recommendations for treating antipsychotic-induced akathisia are to consider antipsychotic monotherapy, reduce the antipsychotic dose, and/or switch to an antipsychotic associated with a lower risk of akathisia.

    “The primary clinical recommendations for treating AIA are to consider antipsychotic monotherapy, to reduce the antipsychotic dose, and/or to switch to an antipsychotic associated with a lower risk of akathisia.9”

    From Drug Efficacy in the Treatment of Antipsychotic-Induced Akathisia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    Searches for dose reduction, polypharmacy, switching, and the recommendation found no matching passage in the paper’s body. The only matching text was labeled Abstract, which cannot serve as evidence under the specified rubric. (LLM, conf=0.65)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pringsheim, T., Gardner, D., Addington, D., Martino, D., Morgante, F., Ricciardi, L., Poole, N., Remington, G., Edwards, M., Carson, A., & Barnes, T. R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Pringsheim, Tamara
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2018-04-23
Volume
63
Issue
11
Pages
719-729
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2802099125
Cited by
89
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Restless Legs Syndrome Research
Keywords
akathisia, antipsychotic-induced akathisia, antipsychotic adverse effects, extrapyramidal symptoms, antipsychotic dose reduction, antipsychotic polypharmacy, antipsychotic switching, beta-blockers, anticholinergic agents, 5-HT2A antagonist, benzodiazepines, vitamin B6

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review