Cited by 65Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

Cannabis Use and Prospective Long-Term Association with Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies: Usage du cannabis et association prospective à long terme avec l’anxiété: une revue systématique et une méta-analyse d’études longitudinales

Open access
Xue, Siqi, Husain, M. Ishrat, Zhao, Haoyu, Ravindran, Arun V.·2021·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: Cannabis use is proposed as a risk factor for psychosis and is associated with depressive disorders. However, the relationship between recreational cannabis use and its longitudinal implications on anxiety conditions is less studied. The aim of this investigation is to systematically evaluate published literature and perform a meta-analysis of the data. Methods: A systematic search was performed of MEDLINE, Embase, and PsychINFO from inception to May 31, 2020, in addition to a hand search. Longitudinal studies that evaluated the relationship of cannabis use and development of anxiety were included. Where applicable, adjusted odds ratios ( ORs) were extracted, pooled, and evaluated using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: After screening of unique abstracts ( n = 6835), the final evaluation included 24 studies, of which 10 reported ORs that were analyzed quantitatively. Cannabis use was significantly associated with increased odds of developing any anxiety conditions ( OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.54). Cannabis use was not significantly associated with developing generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or social anxiety disorder. Review of studies not reporting OR revealed mixed results but are suggestive of a link between cannabis use and increased rates/severity of anxiety. Conclusions: Published evidence suggests that cannabis use is likely associated with increased risk of anxiety in the long term but variability of study designs precludes declaration of a causal relationship. Awareness of this association is of relevance for both clinical practice and mental health policy implementation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0706743720952251

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 60 · Cited by 65

Authors
Xue, S., Husain, M. I., Zhao, H., & Ravindran, A. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Xue, Siqi
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2020-09-10
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
126-138
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W3086624745
Cited by
65
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
cannabis use, recreational cannabis, anxiety disorders, anxiety risk, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, longitudinal associations, mental health policy
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Cannabis, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review