Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4Feminism, Gender, and Social IssuesLatin American and Latino StudiesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“We’re Not All Anti-Choices”: How Controlling Images Shape Latina/x Feminist Abortion Advocacy

R. García, Rocío·2022·Sociological Perspectives

Abstract

Reproductive politics and Latinxs’ politics demonstrate a preoccupation with representations and discourses across time and space. Intersectional feminists theorize how controlling images function as mechanisms of social control by distorting holistic perceptions of marginalized people. While social movement research documents the importance of culture in collective action, little research applies a controlling images interpretive framework to social movement contexts. An important case for examining Latina/x representations is the ideological terrain created by pro-abortion Latina/x feminist advocates. Utilizing a three-year ethnography with California Latinas for Reproductive Justice (CLRJ), written materials produced by the organization, and in-depth interviews with staff, I argue that CLRJ highlights the limitations of existing research, uses feminist approaches to dialogue, and creates structural analyses of inequalities to challenge la santa (the saint), a controlling image centering cisgender mestiza and white Latinas used to assume that all Latinas make poor advocates for reproductive autonomy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/07311214221112623

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Alvirez David, 1976, Ethnic Families in America
  2. 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022342 · DOI
  3. Baca Zinn Maxine, 1982, Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 10
  4. Beauboeuf-Lafontant Tamara, 2009, Behind the Mask of the Strong Black Woman: Voice and the Embodiment of a Costly Performance
  5. Benz Terressa A., 2020, Critical Sociology, 46
  6. Bettie Julie, 2003, Women without Class: Girls, Race, and Identity
  7. 10.1177/001458580503900109 · DOI
  8. Castañeda Antonia, 1990, Between Borders: Essays on Mexicana/Chicana History
  9. Chavez Leo R., 2008, The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation
  10. 10.3167/ghs.2019.120206 · DOI
  11. Cruz-Janzen Martha I., 2017, The Afro-Latin@ Reader: History and Culture in the United States
  12. 10.1525/9780520953598 · DOI
  13. 10.1057/s41276-020-00274-4 · DOI
  14. Denner Jill, 2006, Latina Girls: Voices of Adolescent Strength in the United States
  15. 10.1177/0891243216629928 · DOI
  16. 10.3998/mpub.16801 · DOI
  17. Fine Gary A., 2002, Stories of Change: Narratives and Social Movements
  18. 10.1525/california/9780520229976.001.0001 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0891243209339498 · DOI
  20. 10.7560/757615 · DOI
  21. Gil Rosa Maria, 1996, The Maria Paradox: How Latinas Can Merge Old World Traditions with New World Self-esteem
  22. 10.1093/socpro/spx045 · DOI
  23. 10.7560/716810 · DOI
  24. Hall Stuart, 1989, Radical America, 23, 9
  25. Hill Collins Patricia., 1990, Black Feminist Thought
  26. 10.1080/10875540903489447 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/089124399013002002 · DOI
  28. Lara Irene, 2005, Chicana/Latina Studies, 4, 10
  29. Le Espiritu Yen, 1997, Asian American Women and Men: Labor, Laws, and Love
  30. Lugones María, 2003, Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing Coalition against Multiple Oppressions
  31. 10.1177/0891243216649929 · DOI
  32. McMillan Cottom Tressie, 2019, Thick and Other Essays
  33. 10.1002/symb.398 · DOI
  34. 10.18574/nyu/9780814757352.001.0001 · DOI
  35. 10.7208/chicago/9780226033976.001.0001 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/15377938.2016.1256847 · DOI
  37. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816687398.001.0001 · DOI
  38. 10.1353/hcs.0.0055 · DOI
  39. 10.1023/A:1023332410633 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.7208/chicago/9780226673776.001.0001 · DOI
  41. Ramirez Oscar, 1981, Explorations in Chicano Psychology, 3
  42. 10.1007/s12119-016-9372-z · DOI
  43. Roberts Dorothy, 1997, Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty
  44. Ross Loretta J., 2017, Radical Reproductive Justice: Foundations, Theory, Practice, Critique
  45. Said Edward, 1978, Orientalism
  46. 10.1007/s13178-018-0370-9 · DOI
  47. 10.2307/351737 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/089124301015006006 · DOI
  49. Solinger Rickie, 2005, Pregnancy and Power: A Short History of Reproductive Politics in America
  50. 10.1177/0735275112457914 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/S0277-5395(98)00004-1 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/01419870.2016.1201583 · DOI
  53. 10.1177/0891243208323054 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
R. García, R.
Affiliations
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
Venue
Sociological Perspectives
Published
2022-07-25
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
1208-1227
ISSN
  • 0731-1214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8673
OpenAlex
W4287307079
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociological Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Latin American and Latino Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
controlling images, abortion advocacy, reproductive justice, intersectionality, social control, mestiza, reproductive autonomy, social movements, collective action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review