Cited by 128Technology Use by Older AdultsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Older Adults’ Acceptance of Activity Trackers

Open access
Preusse, Kimberly C., Mitzner, Tracy L., Fausset, Cara Bailey, Rogers, Wendy A.·2017·Journal of Applied Gerontology

Abstract

Objective: To assess the usability and acceptance of activity tracking technologies by older adults. Method: First in our multimethod approach, we conducted heuristic evaluations of two activity trackers that revealed potential usability barriers to acceptance. Next, questionnaires and interviews were administered to 16 older adults ( M age = 70, SD age = 3.09, range age = 65-75) before and after a 28-day field study to understand facilitators and additional barriers to acceptance. These measurements were supplemented with diary and usage data and assessed whether and why users overcame usability issues. Results: The heuristic evaluation revealed usability barriers in System Status Visibility, Error Prevention, and Consistency and Standards. The field study revealed additional barriers (e.g., accuracy, format) and acceptance-facilitators (e.g., goal tracking, usefulness, encouragement). Discussion: The acceptance of wellness management technologies, such as activity trackers, may be increased by addressing acceptance-barriers during deployment (e.g., providing tutorials on features that were challenging, communicating usefulness).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0733464815624151

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consumer-based wearable activity trackers may provide an alternative means of providing ongoing support and motivation to individuals looking to increase or maintain activity levels following a structured lifestyle intervention.

    “This type of emerging technology may provide an alternative means of providing ongoing support and motivation to individuals both looking to increase their activity levels or to maintain activity levels following a structured lifestyle intervention [20].”

    From Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Phase 2 Field Study Results report that older adults found activity trackers encouraging; one Fitbit user said the tracker prompted them to walk more. The paper does not address maintaining activity after a structured lifestyle intervention, so it supports the motivation aspect but not that specific use. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 128

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Albaina IM 2008 Persuasive technology to motivate elderly individuals to walk: A case study Master's Thesis Delft University of Technology The Netherlands
  2. Ananthanarayan S Siek KA 2012 Persuasive wearable technology design for health and wellness the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) 236 240 IEEE
  3. Becker H Stuifbergen A Oh HS Hall S 1993 Self-rated abilities for health practices: A health self-efficacy measure Health Values: The Journal of Health Behavior, Education & Promotion 17 5 42 50
  4. Carroll DL 1995 The importance of self-efficacy expectations in elderly patients recovering from coronary artery bypass surgery Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care 24 1 50 59 7706100
  5. Chen K Chan AHS 2014 Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM) Ergonomics 57 5 635 652 24655221
  6. Colcombe S Kramer AF 2003 Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults A meta-analytic study Psychological Science 14 2 125 130 12661673
  7. Elward K Larson E 1992 Benefits of exercise for older adults. A review of existing evidence and current recommendations for the general population Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 8 1 35 50 1576579
  8. Fausset CB Mitzner TL Price CE Jones BD Fain BW Rogers WA 2013 Older adults' use of and attitudes toward activity monitoring technologies Proceedings of the 2013 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 1683 1687 Santa Monica, CA Human Factors and Ergonomics Society PMC6601605 31263349
  9. Grembowski D Patrick D Diehr P Durham M Beresford S Kay E Hecht J 1993 Self-efficacy and health behavior among older adults Journal of Health and Social Behavior 34 2 89 104 8277130
  10. Holtz B Lauckner C 2012 Diabetes management via mobile phones: A systematic review Telemedicine and e-Health 18 3 175 184 22356525
  11. Markland D Ingledew DK 1997 The measurement of exercise motives: Factorial validity and invariance across gender of a revised Exercise Motivations Inventory British Journal of Health Psychology 2 4 361 376
  12. Nielsen J 1994 Heuristic Evaluation Nielsen J Mack RL Usability Inspection Methods 25 62 New York, NY John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  13. Preusse KC Mitzner TM Fausset CB Rogers WA 2014 Activity monitoring technologies and older adult users: Heuristic analysis and usability assessment Proceedings of the 2014 Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care: Leading the Way 23 27 Santa Monica, California Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  14. Preusse KC Mitzner TM Fausset CB Rogers WA 2014 Older adults' changes in intent to adopt wellness management technologies Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting 200 204 Santa Monica, California Human Factors and Ergonomics Society PMC6601611 31263350
  15. Rejeski WJ Mihalko SL 2001 Physical activity and quality of life in older adults The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 56 suppl 2 23 35 11730235
  16. Rogers EM 2003 Diffusion of innovations 5th New York, NY Free Press
  17. Tudor-Locke C Craig CL Aoyagi Y Bell RC Croteau KA De Bourdeaudhuij I Lutes LD 2011 How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 8 1 80 21798044 PMC3169444
  18. Venkatesh V Morris MG Davis GB Davis FD 2003 User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view MIS Quarterly 27 3 425 478
  19. Venkatesh V Thong JY Xu X 2012 Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology MIS Quarterly 36 1 157 178

Authors
Preusse, K. C., Mitzner, T. L., Fausset, C. B., & Rogers, W. A.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Georgia Tech Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Preusse, Kimberly C.
Venue
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Published
2016-07-07
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
127-155
ISSN
  • 0733-4648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4523
OpenAlex
W2238123643
Cited by
128
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
31.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG017211)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
wearable activity trackers, older adults, technology acceptance, usability, heuristic evaluation, wellness management, physical activity monitoring, goal tracking, usability barriers, older adults with disabilities
MeSH terms
Fitness Trackers, Aged, Aging, Female, Georgia, Health Promotion, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review