The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence and Correlates of Gray Market Use for Aging and Dementia Long-Term Care in the U.S
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the national prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of gray market utilization, consisting of paid providers who are unrelated to the recipient, not working for a regulated agency, and potentially unscreened and untrained, for aging and dementia-related long-term care. Methods: We surveyed a nationally representative sample of 1,037 American Life Panel respondents aged 18 years and older. Results: Nearly a third of Americans who arranged paid care sought gray market care for persons with dementia, and most (65%) combined it with unpaid care. Respondents who arranged gray market care had 66% lower odds of currently working, and those living in rural areas had an almost 5-times higher odds of arranging dementia gray market care. Discussion: Gray market care represents a substantial proportion of paid, long-term care for older adults and may fill gaps in access to care.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One study using a nationally representative sample of adults found that nearly a third of people who arrange paid care for an aging adult or person living with dementia rely on the gray market (rather than a home care agency or other formal care provider).”
From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [777]
Citations
Cites
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
Siconolfi, D. E., Shih, R. A., Friedman, E. M., Kotzias, V. I., Ahluwalia, S. C., Phillips, J. L. H., & Saliba, D. (2019) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.120 · Cited by 107
Self-citationMoving Toward Person- and Family-Centered Care
Feinberg, L. F. (2014) · Public Policy & Aging Report · doi:10.1093/ppar/pru027 · Cited by 65
Favreault, M. M., Gleckman, H., & Johnson, R. W. (2015) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1226 · Cited by 51
A Profile of the Assisted Living Direct Care Workforce in the United States
Kelly, C., Morgan, J. C., Kemp, C. L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/0733464818757000 · Cited by 33
The Homecare Aide Workforce Initiative: Implementation and Outcomes
Feldman, P. H., Ryvicker, M. B., Evans, L. M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/0733464817707298 · Cited by 19
Beware of Data Gaps in Home Care Research
Newquist, D. D., DeLiema, M., & Wilber, K. H. (2015) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558715588437 · Cited by 14
An Exploratory Analysis of Patient-Provider Language-Concordant Home Health Care Visit Patterns
Squires, A. P., Peng, T. R., Barrón‐Vayá, Y., et al. (2017) · Home Health Care Management & Practice · doi:10.1177/1084822317696706 · Cited by 14
Where Policy Meets Practice: Employer Perspectives on Scheduling and Hours for Home Care Aides
Nisbet, E., & Morgan, J. C. (2017) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/0733464817739153 · Cited by 10
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Ngyuen V., 2017, Long-term support and services—AARP facts sheet
- Redfoot D., 2013, Insight on the Issues, 85, 1
- Shih R. A., 2014, Rand Health Quarterly, 4
- U.S Department of Labor, 2011, Preliminary regulatory impact analysis of the proposed revisions to the companionship regulations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures
(2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13809 · Cited by 2,536
Metadata
- Authors
- Shih, R. A., Friedman, E. M., Chen, E. K., & Whiting, G. C.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- National Alliance for Caregiving, Washington, DC, USA
- Corresponding author
- Shih, Regina A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Gerontology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-06-11
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1030-1034
- ISSN
- 0733-4648 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4523
- OpenAlex
- W3171686445
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Gerontology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01MD010360)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- dementia care, long-term care, paid care, unpaid care work, older adults, rural residence, employment status, health care access, prevalence, sociodemographic correlates
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aging, Dementia, Humans, Long-Term Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review