Cited by 36Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesCOVID-19 and Mental HealthNursing education and management

Job Resignation in Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Quality of Employer Communication

Open access
Cimarolli, Verena R., Bryant, Natasha S., Falzarano, Francesca, Stone, Robyn·2022·Journal of Applied Gerontology

Abstract

Limited research has examined coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related work stressors experienced by nursing home (NH) employees and how these stressors may impact employees’ decision to resign when taking organizational factors into account. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether quality of employer communication related to COVID-19 and staff preparedness to care for residents with COVID-19 can mediate the effects of COVID-19-related stressors on NH employees’ ( N = 1,730) decision to resign. Results from path analyses indicate that higher quality of communication and more optimal preparedness mediated the relationship between COVID-19-related stressors and likelihood of resignation. Specifically, higher levels of COVID-19-related stressors were indirectly associated with reduced likelihood of resigning through the paths of more optimal communication and preparedness. Findings underscore the importance of effective employer communication during emergencies in NHs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/07334648211040509

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 36

Authors
Cimarolli, V. R., Bryant, N. S., Falzarano, F., & Stone, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Cimarolli, Verena R.
Venue
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Published
2021-08-25
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
12-21
ISSN
  • 0733-4648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4523
OpenAlex
W3193976442
Cited by
36
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
american federation for aging research (NA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
job resignation, nursing home staff, COVID-19 pandemic, employer communication, occupational stressors, staff preparedness, mediation, organizational communication
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Communication, Humans, Nursing Homes, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review