The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fate of heavy metals during municipal solid waste incineration
Abstract
A thermodynamic analysis was performed to determine whether it is suitable to predict the heavy metal (HM) speciation during the Municipal Solid Waste Incineration process. The fate of several selected metals (Cd, Pb, Zn, Cr, Hg, As, Cu, Co, Ni) during incineration was theoretically investigated. The equilibrium analysis predicted the metal partitioning during incineration and determined the impact of operating conditions (temperature and gas composition) on their speciation. The study of the gas composition influence was based on the effects of the contents of oxygen (reducing or oxidising conditions) and chlorine on the HM partitioning. The theoretical HM speciation which was calculated in a complex system representing a burning sample of Municipal Solid Waste can explain the real partitioning (obtained from literature results) of all metals among the various ashes except for Pb. Then, the results of the thermodynamic study were compared with those of characterisation of real incinerator residues, using complementary techniques (chemical extraction series and X-ray micro-analyses). These analysis were performed to determine experimentally the speciation of the three representative metals Cr, Pb, and Zn. The agreement is good for Cr and Zn but not for Pb again, which mainly shows unleachable chemical speciations in the residues. Pb tends to remain in the bottom ash whereas thermodynamics often predicts its complete volatilisation under chlorides, and thus its presence exclusively in fly ash.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50043a017 · Cited by 12,052
Cited by
Cobalt toxicity in humans—A review of the potential sources and systemic health effects
Leyssens, L., Vinck, B., Van Der Straeten, C., Wuyts, F., & Maes, L. (2017) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2017.05.015 · Cited by 1,045
Devi, P., & Saroha, A. K. (2014) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.093 · Cited by 381
Wang, P., Hu, Y., & Cheng, H. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.082 · Cited by 363
Detoxification, solidification and recycling of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash: A review
Xue, Y., & Liu, X. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.130349 · Cited by 317
Vermeulen, I., Van Caneghem, J., Block, C., Baeyens, J., & Vandecasteele, C. (2011) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.088 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Abanades, S., Flamant, G., Gagnepain, B., & Gauthier, D.
- Venue
- Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-68
- ISSN
- 0734-242X (ISSN-L)
- 1096-3669
- OpenAlex
- W2115678880
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fate of heavy metals during municipal solid waste incineration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0734242x0202000107
- The paper
- Abanades, S., Flamant, G., Gagnepain, B., & Gauthier, D. (2002). Fate of heavy metals during municipal solid waste incineration. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x0202000107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.